llmthrow102

5 ms·

1.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
How does anyone take Okta seriously after this incident btw?
2.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
I'd rather eat sand than read an AI-generated article. If you don't care enough to write it, I don't care enough to read it.
3.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
Greenhouse gas emissions are only a fraction of terrible things that humans are inflicting on the environment, and meat/dairy are both nutritious food that provides requirements for sustenance, and if not eaten need to be replaced by s
4.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
The average American citizen has less influence on politics in their "republic" than a citizen of a dictatorship. Only the will of the financial elite actually has influence. See Gilens and Page 2014. It really doesn't matter
5.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
They've also now launched the Warcraft 3 "remaster" twice, and it's still in a worse state than it was 20 years ago. First they did less than half the job, cut budget, and launched missing major features from the origina
6.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
To be fair, using humans to spend time sifting through AI slop determining what is and isn't AI generated is not a fight that the humans are going to win.
7.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
You mean, you work with devs who are using AI to generate their code.
8.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
You don't need everyone on every team to be a cross-functional thinker, but you need the people who are working cross-functionally to actually think about the big picture and realize they're optimizing for company success and not
9.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
Maybe it's the norm, but it's a dysfunctional company if you have engineering that only cares about "doing things the right way", product that only cares about "get the next feature out as soon as possible", an
10.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
The word for that is livelihood.
11.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
Your idea of optimism is literally replacing the entire human race (the lineage of all humans on the planet) with a simulation of humans? That's pretty bleak.
12.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
The average person spends 9-11 hours per day consuming media depending on what source you look at. When people are playing games or browsing social media at the same time that they have the latest Netflix show on their TV, you can't te
13.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
Completely agree. When you see a business model like this, you know everything about the game is made to get you to spend more money and spend more time in it rather than actually have fun. Maybe that's to be expected from SaaS B2B sof
14.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
That's the same question I have. There is already a ton of great podcasts/music/everything in the niches that I like that I don't have the time to listen to them all. I also like to have quiet introspective time. So wher
15.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
I've made solid side income gambling over a number of different games and sports, and I say it should definitely be banned. It ruins lives, funnels money to terrible people, makes sports worse for everyone, and has no positive impact o
16.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
There aren't major innovations in chairs or mugs that make you throw out your whole collection every few years. Smartphones are just becoming a commodity and there's nothing wrong with that.
17.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
If a company has an AI tool, then you must treat everything that comes out of that tool as if it came from the company directly. If something harmful comes out, then the product is defective and they must compensate users like any other def
18.
by llmthrow102 2y ago
Make companies and their leadership responsible for any harm or damage that comes from AI generated content or actions. If a recipe is a hallucinated recipe and poisons someone, treat it the same as if someone created a salad recipe calling