lizkm

6 ms·

1.
by lizkm 5y ago
Pretty arrogant of you to assume that liberals aren't arming themselves to protect against people that have been threatening violence and advocating for coups to overturn democratic results.
2.
by lizkm 5y ago
As if China does not resemble a mass-surveillance state dystopia already? I'm not sure "improving living conditions" in a country where The Party dictates every aspect of life is something to aspire to.
3.
by lizkm 5y ago
>One has to wonder why they are so focused on [Combating far right extremism and misinformation] when it's clearly designed to benefit the overall establishment system status-quo Far right extremism is a threat to the status quo of
4.
by lizkm 5y ago
>If you provide service to everybody, then you provide service to unsavory types. That doesn't mean you cater to them. Read what the CEO has to say about jewish people [0] [0] https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rob-
5.
by lizkm 5y ago
Not sure how one could conceivably say this is a black hat leak for profit. It's very clearly politically motivated and intended to target the customers who use the registrar for right wing political purposes. I don't really care
6.
by lizkm 5y ago
Cigarettes aren't highly regulated because they are addictive, they are regulated because they literally rot and kill your internal organs. "Some people feel bad about their bodies after viewing social media" doesn't nea
7.
by lizkm 5y ago
Expecting draconian regulations on social media to work is a recipe for failure. How many billions wasted on the war on drugs? People are always going to want to view extremist content, see beautiful people that cause body image issues, etc
8.
by lizkm 5y ago
Pornography does not cause you to go into spasms and die though. You being unable to control yourself does not justify undue restrictions on other people. The internet should not be ceded to nanny staters and morality police.
9.
by lizkm 7y ago
>Nothing about a tracking system actively precludes your being able to jump tracks later in life Nothing necessarily precludes it but does it really happen that often? I couldn't find any data on this. Is there any evidence that &qu
10.
by lizkm 7y ago
> What about tracking students in high-school precludes your being able to attend university at the age of 28? Because the "dumb" students are pushed into trades instead. And good luck going back to university when you don&#x27
11.
by lizkm 7y ago
>In the US this has become increasingly frowned upon by (perhaps) well-meaning administrators who feel that to do this is unconscionable. Because it is unconscionable. I dropped out of high-school at 16. I was able to go back and earn a