Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
liquid_thyme
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5d ago
I've been using the 'ClearURLs' FF addon for quite a while now, and it gives you the URLs back in the results. https://docs.clearurls.xyz/
2.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
7d ago
Even if someone builds a brand, it can get sold and (atleast this twas true last time I checked) the Amazon reviews get grandfathered in.
3.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
9d ago
We used to develop AI to convince us its human (turing test). The future is about convincing AI/Automated Systems that you're - competent (hiring), not a bot (anti-spam), doing your job (KPIs), not a threat (ala social score, AI p
4.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
10d ago
It's not, but believe what you want. Its clear to me that Chrome is a key logger, they bundle it with random software, it spies on the user and collects data on the user, among many other things.
5.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
11d ago
Chrome may be an excellent browser, but the venn diagram overlap with malware keeps getting larger.
6.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
13d ago
Hopefully the way for the United States to compete with China isn't to be more like them.
7.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
19d ago
Oh no, exceptional compound growth! The sadness!
8.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
19d ago
I see, looks like you found something to aspire to. Good job!
9.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
20d ago
Yeah.. America started declining after when they allowed non-whites to immigrate. Worst economy ever starting 1965. No golden era nothing. Go look at the people doing the science & research in universities at post-doc minimum wage salar
10.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
20d ago
Right.. Microsoft, Google, Amazon filled with mediocre Indians writing mediocre code and about to go out of business any minute now. Oh wait, how does reality work again?
11.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
20d ago
>Who corrupted it? As usual, it started with Americans screwing over other Americans while getting you to blame the brown dude. Gosh, darn! Labor is no different than goods/services. Why should the world allow coca-cola, netflix, mc
12.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
4mo ago
I want to run a modern OS with modern features and still run any software that I already paid for 5, 10, 20 years ago. Out of curiosity, have you asked customers to run your software in a VM? How did that conversation go?
13.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
4mo ago
>And rely on the things the things they have built upon to not be rugpulled from under them at random. So 10 years from now, all popular distros should support versions of Facade 1.0, 1.2, 1.42 through Facade 10.2? Now do you see the pro
14.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
>The problem pointed out is a distro, library compatiblity, packaging, or sand-boxing problem, not a Linux problem. Are you suggesting Windows users switch to Linux and not use a popular distro that can provide software they need? Otherw
15.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
If my employer would still pay me the same salary, I couldn't care less about the license. I'm all for outsourcing this problem to the package managers.
16.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
>This is what you do for Flatpack, Steam, or Docker. All these are popular options. Yes, Flatpak is decent, but its a separate runtime with its own sandbox and perms that can sometimes make things more awkward for things like accessing h
17.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
The issue on Linux is that the distro's package manager decides which versions of shared libraries exist system wide, and this works well when you install everything through the package manager. Windows SxS is specifically designed to
18.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
Speaking of portability, As a developer who has shipped software on Windows for over a decade, and then some on Linux. Targeting Windows is insanely easy, because of the ABI. You compile once and you have an extremely high chance that it
19.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
Every single program has to write logic to parse/store/query/validate those values. A common API with a single store can be type-enforced, backed up, and likely easier to work with from an internationalization perspective. I
20.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
>No such thing, at least as long as stock number go up. You want your 401k to go up, don't you? /s
21.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
I like to think of LLMs as idiot savants. Exceptional at certain tasks, but might also eat the table cloth if you stop paying attention at the wrong time. With humans, you can kind of interview/select for a more normalized distribution
22.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
Yes, you're correct. To add - companies don't fundamentally care about all the things that we like to think of as "nice things", like good design, lack of dark patterns, robust security architecture, minimizing technical
23.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
Does sitting and closing eyes not do the same thing? That's what I do when I'm overwhelmed.
24.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
Screen and battery replacements are by far the number one repair service that people avail. The data is clear. I'm afraid you're completely wrong.
25.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
There are various types of triggers for gene activation, some genes turn on/off all the time (housekeeping), some follow the circadian rythm, some are immediate response, some are specific to specific phases of cell division, some are
26.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
This is true when fresh college grads are building stuff. Experienced engineers know how to build things much more efficiently. Also people like to fantasize that their project, their API, their little corner of the codebase is special and
27.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
BTW - UAC is not a security boundary, so UAC-bypass is not the same as privilege escalation, and there is no bounty for it, etc, etc. It's a common misunderstanding, probably in no small part due to Microsoft's own lack of communi
28.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
I'm not seeing it the same way. Businesses in various industries have several types of moats - money, knowledge, experience, skills, etc. There is ton of competitive intelligence hidden in private data. Its one of the reasons you can&#
29.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
fair. I want to +1 the fact that there is a large amount of data unseen by LLMs.
30.
▲
by
liquid_thyme
5mo ago
The amount of private data that is locked up inside private internal databases is huge. This is especially true of regulated industries. There is a wealth of data - financial data showing how to budget for things, pricing data on various pr
More ›