lim_nick

8 ms·

1.
by lim_nick 2y ago
Would love to hear some more about your realization. Any thoughts on what it is about either governments or sensible environmental laws that makes this the case? edit: After rereading I realized I misinterpreted your post. I read "enac
2.
by lim_nick 9y ago
above and beyond the norms of the time?
3.
by lim_nick 9y ago
unfortunately I share your view for the most part, but I'm working to avoid being so fatalist about the outcome here until I see more experimentation
4.
Mastodon Sustainability – hosting costs, scaling concerns, and problem users(medium.com)
42 points by lim_nick 9y ago|10 comments
5.
by lim_nick 11y ago
"it means that if and when the program is reinstated" I'm saying it was never cancelled
6.
by lim_nick 11y ago
yeah this article pretty clearly states what I was trying to get across: "The Justice Department says it's not suspending or shutting down the program — just that it doesn't have the money to pay police departments right now.
7.
by lim_nick 11y ago
"the Department is deferring for the time being any equitable sharing payments from the Program" seems pretty explicitly to be a temporary suspension of payouts from the program, not a closure of the entire program. "We explo
8.
by lim_nick 13y ago
Posted by the same guy who invented facebook and mobile payments, people should listen really closely to this genius!
9.
by lim_nick 16y ago
Here are some numbers for this approach. Here are another two QBFs SALT: [52, 43, 58, 74, 44, 86, 86, 43, 33, 39, 46, 49, 77, 44, 52, 74, 84, 44, 51, 78, 53, 75, 52, 69, 40, 50, 47, 73, 82] BLOCKS: [40, 60, 54, 90, 67, 38, 60, 56, 60, 51, 5
10.
by lim_nick 16y ago
Erik, is there some kind of offset within the ciphertext?
11.
by lim_nick 16y ago
Here are some integer values for the characters of two of the QBFs [72, 55, 81, 36, 86, 49, 49, 37, 38, 61, 62, 86, 40, 63, 57, 43, 57, 62, 50, 47, 36, 43, 68, 38, 36, 54, 54, 86, 67, 46, 69, 52, 78, 37, 61, 33, 46, 77, 55, 41, 49, 70, 70,