liambigelow

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by liambigelow 7mo ago

   CAA records including an accounturi already expose the account identity in the same manner, so I feel like that ship has already sailed somewhat (and I would prefer that the CAA and persist record formats match).
2. 2.▲
   by liambigelow 1y ago

   Serious answer: For some, they do change semi-often and don't feel compelled to declare stability. In other cases, it's a stable + widely used 0.x package, and bumping it to 1.0 usually implies _some_ kind of breaking change. (I d
3. 3.▲
   by liambigelow 1y ago

   https://0ver.org/#notable-zerover-projects
4. 4.▲
   by liambigelow 2y ago

   [ https://truncate.town/](https://truncate.town/) is all egui (after the main menu)
5. 5.▲
   by liambigelow 2y ago

   Yeah I agree, and do the same. Likewise some config gets complex and can only be reasonably set through config. I prefer when I have a system with one base configuration struct where certain fields can be tagged as available on the command
6. 6.▲
   by liambigelow 2y ago

   Ah nice, will peep — in the interest of sharing here is my latest "template" that gets copied from project to project: https://github.com/CloudCannon/toolproof/blob/main/toolproof...
7. 7.▲
   by liambigelow 2y ago

   Looks nice! I like the approach. My holy grail will still be landing on a good multi-layer configuration setup for Rust CLIs. Ideally CLI flags merged over top of environment variables merged over top of configuration files. Twelf [0] was c
8. 8.▲
   by liambigelow 2y ago

   I prefer Tidal’s UI and album management. Tidal also has a good notification system for new releases, and otherwise gets out of the way. I moved to Tidal from Apple Music, but would move back if I had to over any other options. Also, Tidal
9. 9.▲
   by liambigelow 2y ago

   There can be more of a difference than you might expect. In static site generators, Eleventy is about as fast as you can get in the JavaScript world, and is still 2-3x the time for Hugo in Go [1]. A couple orders of magnitude more than <
10. 10.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Thanks for the kind words! Many good notes, we'll look into a lot of that. And yes currently it's deliberate, but I think we can squeeze some AI swaps in!
11. 11.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Good ideas! Thanks for the notes :) Yes dictionary is a tough thing to nail down perfectly — to start with we're going to highlight existing words on the board that are invalid, but have a similar line of thinking around the "comm
12. 12.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Not at the moment, but it's only a question of finding good dictionaries to expand the language support :)
13. 13.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Amazing! Thanks for the detailed notes, and the insight. Dictionary does still need work — especially around some words like soiree which got culled by our dictionary builder. We'll iterate on building it out (without adding "garb
14. 14.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Yeah that's probably the best solution.
15. 15.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Great suggestions, thanks!
16. 16.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Thanks for the kind words! On 1. — this is definitely the most common piece of feedback so far, so we'll certainly look into it. On 2. — the battles rules are the most complex part of the game, since they have evolved through the play
17. 17.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Thanks for the comment — we'll take another crack at clarifying the starting position :)
18. 18.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Thanks for the feedback — it's looking like we'll have to find some solution for showing valid words, based on the comments. (Also, will fix the dictionary, thanks!)
19. 19.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Interesting suggestions, and thanks for the kind words! Definitely things to ponder :)
20. 20.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Good ideas, will check out the queens gambit game :)
21. 21.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Nice! We've had this on the list for a while so this is great validation for building it :)
22. 22.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Thanks for the great notes! Agree on all front re: the dictionary ergonomics. We'll look at smoothing that out (mobile is currently the blocker there, but everything is solvable :) Re: visualizations, you make great points. Definitely
23. 23.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Oh good note thanks, my mistake. It should be MIT, I'll add the license today.
24. 24.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Amazing, thanks for the feedback! > edit: seems like the board editing in multiplayer mode doesn't work oops, will get onto fixing that
25. 25.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Ah, 2am reading comprehension on my part. Yes, if we ever remove rather than add to the dictionary in the future I might look to axe it.
26. 26.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Oh! Yes, this is an interesting case. Towns actually slot into the battle as one-letter words, so this case FEN is long enough. It doesn't come up much, but it might deserve elaboration in an "advanced" tutorial since it&#x27
27. 27.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    We source the definitions from Wiktionary, but have a much higher bar for words to count as valid in the game. ST comes up often, as I agree it's one of the iffier words, but even Cambridge claims to to be so: https://dictio
28. 28.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Good notes on both fronts, so thanks! We have been on the fence about this (and still are!). One option is to add this kind of UI in a "tutor" mode that starts on, and can be opt-out at some point. Not sold on it yet, but mulling
29. 29.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Good point, I think we discussed this in the past and it shouldn't be — which we promptly forgot! Will amend. (and thanks!)
30. 30.▲
    by liambigelow 2y ago

    Amazing! Thanks for the detailed thoughts. Yes, we once posited that you were trying to deliver soup to the other town haha. The current language is really in lieu of figuring out what the best lore for the game is, and these are great sugg