Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lgrapenthin
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
1mo ago
Because its all moonshining. Trying to make gold from pyrite.
2.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
2mo ago
Choose any LISP, and the right LISP will choose you.
3.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
2mo ago
tldr; they decided to sacrifice quality for quantity via outsourcing their programming, and find Python more suitable for this. Which it always has been, whether outsourcing to cheap "talent" overseas, or now a subscription servi
4.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
3mo ago
Not a day passes with my LLM of choice making completely baseless claims about "many people", who supposedly share all my problems and solve them like the LLM proposes
5.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
3mo ago
"Here is the X part", a commonly generated attention catcher these days, combined with an expert level fact, compacted into casual tone. Note it does not state opinion or reports subjective experience, which alltogether makes it a
6.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
3mo ago
did you generate this comment?
7.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
4mo ago
"As a rule of thumb, if your application never has 10,000 virtual threads or more, it is unlikely to benefit from virtual threads." https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/21/core/virtual-th
8.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
4mo ago
Clojure is about its rigorous and pragmatic "immutability first" paradigm that you simply don't get from other PLs. LISP is much more than just a runtime syntax, such as its distinct evaluation model and metalinguistic core.
9.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
4mo ago
Why does this read like written by AI?
10.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
4mo ago
What you are describing is exactly a security implication.
11.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
5mo ago
Might be some personal beef, but I don't know really and don't care enough. He makes these authorative claims mixed with personal sentiment and then doesn't back them up. Here for instance the core team supposedly has "
12.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
5mo ago
Of course calling out baseless FUD is helpful. Otherwise it just discourages people from engaging with Clojure, which is not helpful.
13.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
5mo ago
There is no falling apart. This guy just tries to spread this narrative every two months or so, idky. Check out latest dev call https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngyvDkZA3o0
14.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
5mo ago
Indeed. Generated code is also harder to read because it violates all semantic expectations that rely on the mental model of a human author. A generated piece of code is linguistically plausible but often unknowingly imitates common idiom
15.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
5mo ago
In Clojure true: true false: false null: nil []: [] {}: {}
16.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
5mo ago
They are just trying to peddle their "It's alive" headlines. Text generators mostly generate the text their are trained and asked to generate, and asking it to run a vending machine, having it write blog posts under fictional
17.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
7mo ago
Assuming that everybody disagreeing with such takes simply can't have tried the latest generator is quite telling. Consider, that maybe, I'm not as easily impressed?
18.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
7mo ago
My hammer is also solving problems. Still, hammering is not programming. LLMs are text generators.
19.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
7mo ago
You are comparing a PL to a text generator. What are you on?
20.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
7mo ago
The negativity is driven by outrageous claims how AIs will replace programmers, or how english is the PL of the future. T
21.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
8mo ago
Its generating an approximation of what it was trained on. Call it whatever you want, just not AGI or the road to AGI.
22.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
8mo ago
How brave of you
23.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
9mo ago
There is a newer version here https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sogomonian-aiip-archi... I don't understand what problem this is trying to solve though.
24.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
9mo ago
I tried this on a small Clojure codebase and asked it to write some tests. It couldn't get its parentheses balanced. After 10 attempts or so it tried to write a smaller test file first, but again failed. Regardless of the parentheses
25.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
10mo ago
To me, it was never about the hardware. It was not even about LISP. It is about "clean design" and what a great computing environment was capable of, and still would be, had its potential not been shredded by the advent of cheap
26.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
10mo ago
A transducer transforms a reducing function. Its signature is rfn->rfn. The resulting rfn can then be used to reduce/fold from any collection/stream type into any other collection/stream type. I don't see what your
27.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
11mo ago
Maybe not "elegant", but quite readable compiler impl. compared to what I have seen. And which (real world) compiler has an "elegant" implementation anyways.
28.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
11mo ago
Those are not fully featured web frameworks, I guess they were just labeled by AI for this website. They are libraries specialized on one thing. Most problems solved by frameworks don't exist in Clojure. Most problems introduced by f
29.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
1y ago
No. Those have unbounded message queues.
30.
▲
by
lgrapenthin
1y ago
If search was only about finding existing texts, LLMs would be qualitatively worse, as they frequently misquote or even invent non existing sources.
More ›