lez

7 ms·

1.
by lez 23d ago
Because Eurosky can ban you.
2.
by lez 2mo ago
At the point it gets solid and useful, the powers that be will immediately use them as weapon.
3.
by lez 7mo ago
It has already been so with ppq.ai (pay per query dot AI)
4.
by lez 10mo ago
Thank you. I heard the number locally at a privacy conference. No hard data, but I saw them being terrified for 1984 becoming a reality. Even if there's no sentence, the real result is self-censorship, which is NOT shown up in ANY stat
5.
by lez 10mo ago
It is happening, in spite many won't really deeply believe. Every day 33 brits are arrested for what they say online. It's happening, and it's time we say no. It's uncomfortable, but we need to do it en masse, right no
6.
by lez 10mo ago
You are not alone being hit hard by the pace of the cancer's progression. Dr Makis talks about his shocks lately as an oncologist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gIYQCjB_NU
7.
by lez 10mo ago
I was thinking the same. Seems HN is now pro-bank and anti-cryptocurrency.
8.
by lez 11mo ago
There IS an optional list for ublock origin that tries to get rid of cookie nonsense.
9.
by lez 1y ago
It started a line of thoughts in me. What if the backend keeps the videos around for a longer period of time, and: * regularly checks youtube, and whenever one archived video gets deleted from youtube, it advertises the video ID on a speci
10.
by lez 1y ago
Just like the cambridge link he shared: it is a well written article with tons of references describing the source of the information.
11.
by lez 1y ago
You must abolish all privacy from the internet, and even then, you wouldn't be able to stop CP to happen. Good luck, Mr. Big Brother!
12.
by lez 2y ago
I think such an appliance had already been invented. They are called "trees". All they need to do their work is corporations leaving them alone.
13.
by lez 2y ago
According to your argument, if Gorhill gets upset at Mozilla, then Gorhill is the problem? Who is the extremist here?
14.
by lez 2y ago
Nostr.
15.
by lez 2y ago
Check primal.net to find that app you are talking about.
16.
by lez 2y ago
Every time I throw away a piece of plastic in the communal bin I think about that it should have never been manifactured from plastic, but from some plant / glass / etc.
17.
by lez 2y ago
For other usecases there is an ipfilter target TARPIT, that does a similar thing on the TCP level.
18.
by lez 3y ago
You can use your OS to do that: Run: `env HOME=~/nyxt-profile-work nyxt` and `env HOME=~/nyxt-profile-personal nyxt` for separating profiles.
19.
by lez 3y ago
Slippery slope fallacy here. Why should I care if my online customer is he/she/they as long as they pay the price? Or if I talk about technology through the Internet? All I want is effective communication with no insults.
20.
by lez 3y ago
I like this point very much: "You can be as vague or detailed as you like when speaking lojban. For example, specifying tense (past, present or future) or number (singular or plural) is optional when they're clear from context.&qu
21.
by lez 3y ago
For the overcautious theoretic thinkers here, I recommend reading about Coimbra protocol, where 50,000 IU daily is not rare. It can go up to 300,000 IU per day. At levels above 10,000 IU per day you should take precautions to prevent calcif
22.
by lez 3y ago
One factor that you haven't mentioned is government-sponsored, man-made weaponized strains of pathogens, just like Mycoplasma Fermentans Incognitus: http://www.betterhealthguy.com/images/stories/PDF/PHA&#
23.
by lez 3y ago
This is exactly how the most disturbing downvotes happen to me. When enough people are conditioned to believe X is a dangerous misinfo about Y topic, we are in a bubble and cannot discuss Y anymore openly because of "safety of the read
24.
by lez 3y ago
Oh, how much I loved those times when google returned the best document on the Internet (still) called "LSD faq". https://erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_faq.shtml It states its dangers: Purely psychologic
25.
by lez 3y ago
Breathwork is something that you should experience yourself to know what's in it for you. Notes won't help. Practice for 3-6 months, then listen to the podcast again. Then, you can relate Huberman's words with your own experi
26.
by lez 3y ago
The writer of the article clearly wants to put negative light on Huberman and in general frightens readers away from taking responsibility for their own health. The tone is suggesting not to waste money on vitamins or minerals or supplement
27.
by lez 5y ago
Nobody is right to be "knocked", it's discourse and leaving alone each other's freedoms what could work. Same as with the russians: censoring "knocking" Russian media won't solve anything, just create a mo
28.
by lez 5y ago
It's no question he is against any kind of censorship.
29.
by lez 5y ago
Looking at the greyed out comments it seems HN is not pro, but against scientific debate. Questioning science IS part of the scientific method. https://c19ivermectin.com/ is a very adequate counter-argument to the article,
30.
by lez 5y ago
Taking one person's opinion and projecting it to millions is not part of the scientific method. It is like being angry to one jew and killing 6 million (see Hitler's life).

More ›