Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
lexaude
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
lexaude
7y ago
Here's an even better proposal - lets try immeasurably hard to stop re-inventing words and maybe use words that people would generally understand without an accompanying definition. Where, for instance, software actually means software
2.
▲
Show HN: PaperVC | Data-driven investing in Indian startups
(paper.vc)
1 points
by
lexaude
9y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
awesome. nicely done. noticed your launch on product hunt and waiting to see how this evolves.
4.
▲
Jumpers and the Software Defined Localhost
(coreos.com)
30 points
by
lexaude
12y ago
|
6 comments
5.
▲
Google Adsense Law Suit
(online.wsj.com)
2 points
by
lexaude
12y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Culture isn't a great answer to throw around when people are asking hard questions about a program that is the financial backbone of a company. In fact its downright snooty to presume that allegations like this stem from folks who have
7.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
You're right. We received more than a few brickbats for this since yesterday. So we changed the github oauth request scope. As it stands now, the data we request is only the user scope which includes the user's private email addre
8.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Quay.io is a great product and if you're happy with it we don't recommend moving to Gandalf.io. Gandalf.io went live yesterday and still very much in early beta and we're still improving the functionality and experience. The
9.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
We love you guys. in fact, we didn't realize you guys were the competition till we were in alpha :)
10.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
I do agree that's something we might have to change if the signups slow down. And we need to do a cost-benefit on that perhaps. At the moment, folks are signing up though :)
11.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Thank you! yes, sometimes we misunderstand the intent of a comment. and sometimes we don't :)
12.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Our goal is to integrate your docker workflow very tightly with github. The user will be able to decide which features to switch on and off and whether to write or only read! Obviously we'd rather announce these features when they'
13.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
agreed. next stop - trusted builds. I'll announce you'll sign up?
14.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
We will. But we won't be offering an enterprise plan while we're in beta :) Sure we're sending a signal that we're not ready for enterprise folks. I can be candid in saying that we'd rather be the digital ocean of d
15.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
disappointed. not even a single free docker?
16.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
I assure you we've debated this a lot before putting out that pricing. There is a way to do this and do this well. For us pricing docker hosting competitively is the best way to do it, especially for a startup ecosystem that is only ju
17.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Yikes. less said the better. more later. :)
18.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Sharing private containers among team members, especially when remote working. That's the best use case. Storing your own private containers for access from multiple locations or machines. Auto-deploying containers using the standard d
19.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
We're currently offering the service without constraints - its still a beta offering and we could add limits later on. We're assuming you'll build a docker within reasonable limits - say 3-4GB max. FAQ page coming up soon.
20.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
btw, for support questions - we're #gandalfio on freenode
21.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
for one you can get started with a private repo without paying for it. You can securely share it with your entire team and not pay one cent, and you can do that just by creating an account on gandalf.io. Secondly, for those who're star
22.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
I'd also add that closed and open source often feed into each other in a kind of symbiotic relationship. Sounds controversial to the libertarians and hard-core open source folks but that's the way it usually plays out.
23.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
:D thank you.
24.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
hmmm. I was a lawyer in a previous avatar. I think we're ok.
25.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Not really - much like private repos on github don't go against the spirit of github's public repos. The kind folks at Docker, Inc. the company behind this fantastic technology, themselves recently announced a commercial private r
26.
▲
by
lexaude
12y ago
Heh. yeah. its worked for us so far internally. we're scratching our own itch. and it certainly could use a lot of polish. but we think our core focus on docker collab could help us fine tune it and provide a fantastic service with all
27.
▲
Show HN: Gandalf – $1 private Docker registries
(gandalf.io)
37 points
by
lexaude
12y ago
|
45 comments
28.
▲
by
lexaude
13y ago
And they did!
29.
▲
by
lexaude
13y ago
And they're back in business :)
30.
▲
by
lexaude
13y ago
It did sound like I was criticising Github but that wasn't what I intended. Github actually came out looking good because like Google, its done a good job posting a copy of all takedown notices. In fact, looks like Github put all the r
More ›