levn11

4 ms·

1.
by levn11 10mo ago
my life: https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
2.
by levn11 2y ago
i mean https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer... ...
3.
by levn11 2y ago
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
4.
by levn11 2y ago
so how much do you just stare at grass and yell at the sky
5.
by levn11 2y ago
I would make food shelters and start a school, a dream of mine.
6.
by levn11 2y ago
it follows specifically from the form on pages 1-3. i would recommend reading it with fresh eyes after a good night's rest.
7.
by levn11 2y ago
I won't reply further to this question about g, i do think i've been clear. and at this point you can be on your merry way still thinking it's wrong. but you simply misunderstood.
8.
by levn11 2y ago
it's a proof by contradiction. g would divide a+b-c IF a+b-c are integers. for n=2, g(2)=(c-a)(c-b)g_1(2) and g_1(2)=2. So only when n=2 is it true that g divides a+b-c. Otherwise we get a contradiction that it divides. since then, g_1
9.
by levn11 2y ago
i believe you skipped pages 1-3. g_1(2)=2 for all a,b,c with n=2. g(n) carries with it the assumption of a^n+b^n=c^n as i showed in pages 1-3.
10.
by levn11 2y ago
This is only true for a,b,c that satisfies a^2+b^2=c^2. So a=b=3 and c=n=2 is not part of the solution set.
11.
by levn11 2y ago
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
12.
by levn11 2y ago
which part
13.
by levn11 2y ago
https://www.techrxiv.org/users/717330/articles/702287-on-fer...
14.
by levn11 2y ago
Exactly. I have my degree as well, so I was doing some research of my own. It’s an ongoing thing.
15.
by levn11 2y ago
techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170629872.29614231/v1
16.
An Interesting Proof(techrxiv.org)
1 points by levn11 3y ago|1 comments
17.
by levn11 3y ago
Seems like some kind of novel approach. Looks right to me. But my math is okay, so I need better eyes.
18.
by levn11 3y ago
https://figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fermat_s_Last_and_the...
19.
by levn11 3y ago
PLEASE read this as this is literally about thinking of center of mass as existing in more than 0 dimensions. the book is called The Zero Point Paradox and has everything to do about singularities
20.
by levn11 3y ago
They did nothing, apparently. Just kept on keeping on
21.
by levn11 3y ago
Location: Los Angeles, CA Remote: yes Willing to relocate: maybe Technologies: i have a masters in applied math, i know python, i wrote a book, and i am publishing a math proof. But im also in need of employment. Resume: I will email resume
22.
by levn11 3y ago
They quickly delete any posts related to such a proof. Or at least any of my posts about it
23.
Ask HN: I would like an honest discussion about this math proof?(archive.org)
1 points by levn11 3y ago|2 comments
24.
by levn11 3y ago
Number theory and spacetime! I have a proof for an old number theory problem
25.
by levn11 3y ago
"there is no spoon" xD
26.
by levn11 3y ago
Location: USA Remote: yes Willing to relocate: yes Technologies: python, savvy with programs, grad degree is applied math Résumé/CV: upon request Email: carlosfvillacres@hotmail.com
27.
by levn11 3y ago
https://archive.org/details/fermat-3/page/n5/mode/2up If you would like to check out an elementary proof for Fermat's Last Theorem (or at least an attempt)