lerchmo

5 ms·

1.
by lerchmo 3d ago
I can’t deploy a toy project to a vm without triggering the classifier.
2.
by lerchmo 3d ago
You can run opus 4.8 level models on $10k in hardware or less. Just seems like there is little argument to explain why there are 10s of trillions in future profits for these labs.
3.
by lerchmo 3d ago
Risks are understood by everyone who has read sci fi. Dario has been crying wolf from day one… he should not be the messenger here.
4.
by lerchmo 23d ago
The internet created lots of monopolies with network effects and economies of scale.a low margin commoditized business that still attracted a trillion dollars of investment to get off the ground was not how I envisioned it happening either.
5.
by lerchmo 1mo ago
What is the fitness function , eval?
6.
by lerchmo 2mo ago
A fantastically useful commodity that resists monopoly is the best outcome.
7.
by lerchmo 2mo ago
Makes sense, subsidizing tokens doesn’t seem like a great strategy for a public company.
8.
by lerchmo 2mo ago
Exactly developers can switch to another coding cli and the learning curve is close to zero. Mindshare without switching costs is just a popsicle in the sun.
9.
by lerchmo 2mo ago
If your business leaks to your customers… if you can ask your product for its inner secret sauce and it readily gives away the goose. That is not a moat.
10.
by lerchmo 2mo ago
Also probably betting on their compute and energy capabilities.
11.
by lerchmo 7mo ago
This is important. 20 billion is just like a rumor? would love to see the breakdown in the form of audited financials.
12.
by lerchmo 8mo ago
I also see ghosty consume a massive amount of memory and periodically need to restart.
13.
by lerchmo 9mo ago
I would assume he is a fiduciary... I am curious what happens with investors here?
14.
by lerchmo 9mo ago
curious how the execs can honor the fiduciary duty to share holders assuming only they? get the 20 billion and the company is left headless and leaking all of its intellectual property to Nvidia?
15.
by lerchmo 1y ago
I see thinking can be toggled in the CLI, anyone figured out how to toggle it in the extension?
16.
by lerchmo 1y ago
smolagents uses a similar mechanism.
17.
by lerchmo 1y ago
in the context of LLM's we are in the Friendster era
18.
by lerchmo 1y ago
Boggle head is basically pick 2-3 vanguard etfs and check back in 25 years.
19.
by lerchmo 1y ago
assuming this is something like covered calls?
20.
by lerchmo 1y ago
Why don’t they just offer a $500/m plan?
21.
by lerchmo 1y ago
Time to start using Claude code proxy and other models. This black box rate limit is really lame.
22.
by lerchmo 1y ago
Alot of deterministic systems externalize their edge cases to the user. The software design doesn’t fully match the reality of how it gets used. Ai can be far more flexible in the face of dynamic and variable requirements.
23.
by lerchmo 1y ago
You could hire 100 people to manage your timeseries data and save 70%
24.
by lerchmo 1y ago
One thing I don’t understand about these agent frameworks… cursor, Claude, Claude code, cline, v0… all of the large production agents with leaked prompts use xml function calling, and it seems like these frameworks all only support native j
25.
by lerchmo 1y ago
claude code will do this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TIXl2rlA6Q&t=580s
26.
by lerchmo 1y ago
Enough to kill is a meaningless metric.
27.
by lerchmo 1y ago
https://aider.chat/docs/leaderboards/ your experience doesn't align with my experience or this benchmark. o1 pro is good but I would rather do 20 cycles on gemini 2.5 rather than wait for Pro to return.
28.
by lerchmo 1y ago
The switching costs are so low (zero) that anyone using these models just jumps to the best performer. I also agree that this is not a brand or narrative sensitive project.
29.
by lerchmo 2y ago
I think an API would be fantastic for use cases like Aider / SWE agents. The primary issue besides fully understanding the code base is having up-to-date knowledge on libraries and packages. Perplexity has "online" models. An
30.
by lerchmo 2y ago
this is mainly to prolong time on site / impressions that can be served. of course 98% of the banners on those pages are served by doubleclick (google) and thus google makes more money, the crappier the page.

More ›