legalcorrection

5 ms·

1.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
I'm sure. It's really a lovely place full of lovely people. And the standard of living is still relatively high. They are their own worst enemies sadly.
2.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
> sigh what is the point. Might as well talk gibberish in this "us vs them" society Yeah it’s too bad. The quality of service has totally gone to shit in this country. But God forbid you complain, then you’re a Karen. People a
3.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Incredible to see how many people in these comments are mad that someone dare challenge that their dear GNU/Linux is a great desktop OS. This is part of why it will never get there. The Linux community just doesn’t Get It. Too much aut
4.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
In your world, disease and famine would be much more common than they are now.
5.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
It’s a false promise. You’re just moving the complexity elsewhere, into wiring this ridiculous graphql infrastructure together and making it actually do what you want in all but the simplest/tutorial-like scenarios.
6.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Ignore all the noise and just use an RPC model between your backend and frontend. All these stupid trends and overengineered abstractions will come and go, but people will still be using plain RPC in 5, 10, 100, and 1000 years.
7.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
MSVC doesn’t enforce strict aliasing to begin with. And passing /d2UndefIntOverflow makes signed integer overflow well-defined. Even if you don’t pass it, MSVC is very conservative in exploiting that UB, precisely to avoid breaking cod
8.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Okay so take the two most complained about UBs, improper aliasing and signed integer overflow. Every compiler I’ve ever used lets you turn both into defined behavior.
9.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Oh really? Then why does every compiler I use have a parameter to turn off strict aliasing? You cite to a source that contradicts you. In the llvm blog post: "It is also worth pointing out that both Clang and GCC nail down a few behavi
10.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Your comment is indecipherable. It sounds like it might be interesting. Any chance you could rephrase?
11.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
It’s not the greatest but it’s also not awful. Ideally the 123 would be replaced by a less common sequence, and maybe add one more word, but as is, it’s fine .
12.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
These people are just regurgitating HN memes and then flailing when someone prods a bit deeper. C is basically the Donald Trump of HN. All rational thought goes out the door at the mere mention. In fact, you’re socially rewarded for joining
13.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Tell me, what’s wrong with variably modified types specifically?
14.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
You are confusing the C standard and actual platforms/C implementations. A lot of things are UB in the standard but perfectly well defined on your platform. Standards don’t compile code, real compilers do. The standard doesn’t provide
15.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
You are entering the function. It's not in the function body in the source file, but the code is almost certainly inserted at the beginning of the function in the compiled output.
16.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
This is a common misconception. Cold emailing is legal under the CAN-SPAM Act.
17.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
People reuse passwords and having your password appear in a list of known passwords, even without being associated to your email, is reason enough to change it.
18.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
This is wrong. You are logging their password attempts and then sharing them with the world. It doesn’t matter that you think you know they are scammers. What gives you the right to dispense vigilante justice by disclosing people’s password
19.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
These days, if something is print only or has similar stupid hurdles, I suspect that the purpose is market segmentation. Some people will prefer to avoid the hassle and just pay full price or go without. Which means the company can offer th
20.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Never underestimate how out of touch and incapable of understanding other people HN nerds are.
21.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Orange man bad
22.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Your position sounds much more religious and dogmatic than those held by the people you are arguing against.
23.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
The bureaucracy expands until external factors force it to stop or contract. Google Search and Ads are a small percent of the company but nearly all the revenue. It’s not hard to see how that can lead to runaway bureaucracy.
24.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Not a good argument from you. As if the sheer number of employees is what made Google successful in the first place. And as if efficiency alone makes a successful company. Why would you think these things?
25.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
The US had the military might to extract total submission from the populations of those countries. Anytime someone attacks your troops, kill them and their family and raze their neighborhood/town. But that would obviously be at odds wi
26.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Will you tire of posting about this stupidity? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32117175
27.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Everyone who goes to a coffee shop with their work laptop is probably connecting to a VPN over open WiFi.
28.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
The vast vast majority of Europeans don’t have unlimited data plans with unlimited tethering. Not sure why you would think they do.
29.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
For connecting between two Windows machines, I want to use the RDP protocol, but the built-in RDP client and server don't take care of the NAT/firewall traversal and such. Is there a software solution like TeamViewer or RustDesk t
30.
by legalcorrection 4y ago
Wrong. They killed every white person they could possibly find.

More ›