ledoublegui

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Hi, clon! "Would it be possible to have a single large highly available index with tenants of wildly different sizes?" Yes, we can imagine API keys allowing each consumer to have access to a certain number of documents in an index
2. 2.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Hi jabo! Thank you very much. That is very kind of you. It's always difficult to establish this kind of matrix when you can't necessarily know all the technical details and features with that level of details you wanted to emphasi
3. 3.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Thanks for your answer dawnerd. I will take a look at it with fresh eyes, we may have missed something :)
4. 4.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Thanks adrianvincent! Did you see https://docs.meilisearch.com/reference/features/filtering.ht... ?
5. 5.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Hi, rvz! (Product team member of MeiliSearch here). This comparative table is not accurate and contains wrong pieces of information about MeiliSearch. However, today TypeSense indeed has more features than MeiliSearch. After a long time of
6. 6.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Hi berkes! (Guillaume from the MeiliSearch team here) I'm glad to see you were able to implement a solution for your project ;)
7. 7.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Hi dawnerd! Sorry to hear that, do you have the issue link so that we can take a look at it? Based on the informations I can read here, I think it comes from the fact that the engine is not able to give an exhaustive finite number of record
8. 8.▲
   by ledoublegui 5y ago

   Hi! MeiliSearch product team here! It's super cool to see your feeback! Concerning the disjunctive count of the facets, we are thinking about it. It is feasible on the client side by making several requests but we are aware that is it