leadholder

6 ms·

1.
by leadholder 14y ago
I recently worked on a site run on such a server. I've set up my own servers before, and I think it can be fun, but this time it was the other guy's. I have to say it was pretty annoying because the little things that were not set up proper
2.
by leadholder 14y ago
>generate web sites for commercial art galleries (who didn't want web sites). Were you generating the sites in sort of a 3rd-party, no-connection way, or did they just want someone to create their sites for them?
3.
by leadholder 14y ago
I took E16, newly installed on my laptop, to a work presentation once. I was really excited to turn the thing on and see everyone's eyes bug out. But I plugged the projector in and it turned out there was some strange compatibility problem.
4.
by leadholder 14y ago
When you scale it down to letterhead size, it is no longer NEMA 6 compliant. :-(
5.
by leadholder 14y ago
I wasn't sure what the point of the article was. Reinforcing pricing notions of a specific group was my second guess, and from what you're saying, that's the right one.
6.
by leadholder 14y ago
$10000+ is the "domain of big-budget agencies"? What exact kind of work are we talking about here? Certainly not websites...that are any good... :) Maybe that's the problem I had with this post--no project parameters are visible. Because it
7.
by leadholder 14y ago
Don't forget that Nike's original logo was accepted due to time constraints. The swoosh was combined with an incredibly badly aligned logotype that was altered later before finally arriving at "swoosh only." http://www.logoblog.org/nike_lo
8.
by leadholder 14y ago
Sure it is a bit of an overpayment for a cheap logo. Like any bad logo though, it just sits there and waits for refinement. With all of the "X Corp got their now-famous logo" comments, what isn't mentioned is the way the logos evolve over t