ld4nt3

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ld4nt3 8d ago

   Yeah but trends seems to point strongly that upcoming models in the next few years will make it orders of magnitude easier to develop one with no real expertise.
2. 2.▲
   by ld4nt3 2mo ago

   This happened before for arc agi 1 and 2 great gains but high costs then slowly but surely the price dropped for less than a dollar per task and got saturated.
3. 3.▲
   by ld4nt3 2mo ago

   Yes an no current models can read and output much more faster with differing quality tho.
4. 4.▲
   by ld4nt3 10mo ago

   Yes everyone is doing that on benchmarks but they are still somewhat useful and the likes arc agi even more, though we are not be able to quantize exactly how much better they are getting they are still necessary. For arc agi these are some
5. 5.▲
   by ld4nt3 10mo ago

   Its almost certain that it was, but the purpose of this puzzle benchmark is that it shouldn't really be possible just to be memorized by the amount of variations that can be created and other criteria detailed in it.
6. 6.▲
   by ld4nt3 10mo ago

   Yes you can build your dataset of n puzzles but it was still really hard for any system to achieve any scores, it even beats specialized one for this just one task and this puzzles shouldn't really be possible just to be memorized by t