laurowyn

5 ms·

1.
by laurowyn 2mo ago
> You can just make the tool calls restricted/scoped to whatever the calling account has access to (or in this case the repo) Which is treating the symptom, not the cause. I agree in principle that this is the minimum that should be
2.
by laurowyn 4mo ago
> What is the use case? It's primarily just an experimental system. Demonstrating that fixed infrastructure isn't actually necessary to communicate. Beyond that, it's a mixture of HAM radio for communicating with people ou
3.
by laurowyn 4mo ago
To be fair, the hop limit has to die somewhere. It's an intricate balancing act of causing packet storms vs failure to deliver messages. 6 degrees of separation is probably the intended design constraint, assuming there are sufficient
4.
by laurowyn 5mo ago
And when the system fails for whatever reason? Just because AI exists doesn't mean we can neglect basic design principles. If we throw everything out the window, why don't we just name every file as a hash of its content? Why both
5.
by laurowyn 5mo ago
> Why does AI need that folder structure? Why not a flat list of files and let the AI agent explore with BM25 / grep, etc. It doesn't. The human creating the files needs it, to make it easier to traverse in future as the file c
6.
by laurowyn 10mo ago
Why not think of it a different way; why do we need to put up with breaking changes at all? I'd much rather stand up a replacement system adjacent to the current one, and then switch over, than run the headache of debugging breaking ch
7.
by laurowyn 11mo ago
> They are no longer able to process the requested commercials with due diligence no longer able? or no longer willing to, because it impacts their bottom line?
8.
by laurowyn 2y ago
> But let's ignore that web API worst case. Imagine that you have some semi-trusted software and because you don't want to take any risks, you run in nested VMs three layers deep. The software has some plausible excuse to requi
9.
by laurowyn 2y ago
It's absolutely a good thing, and arguably not a security issue at all. It needs access to the command interface of the chip, which means you need to either have physical access to the device or compromise whatever is physically connec
10.
by laurowyn 2y ago
I would say `narrator voice` in this context is distinctly different from internal dialogue. Obviously the internal voice can narrate to yourself, but that voice tends to be slightly different in my experience. Narrator voice is a specific
11.
by laurowyn 2y ago
I have a narrator voice when reading code. It's the same narrator voice as when reading technical reports and white papers. I do sometimes struggle to process code that doesn't read well, likely because the cadence of the narrator
12.
by laurowyn 2y ago
...you can mark all the books you've checked with a hole so you know you've checked them. Work harder, not smarter. /s Jokes aside, I still agree with GP, in that there are more practical skills that are left out of education
13.
by laurowyn 3y ago
But the only differing cost in that scenarios is the 2 extra conductors to the local transformer, and more likely just to the edge of the property. The 3-phase power is still present in the area, as ideally alternating houses are on alterna
14.
by laurowyn 3y ago
Certainly an interesting one. IANAL, but I believe the terms of the purchased license would be to use the product with only the license key provided. Therefore using an alternative key would be a breach of the license terms, meaning you&#x2
15.
by laurowyn 3y ago
Commonplace books, reading reflection, daily log, zettelkasten are all alternative techniques that achieve much the same as a log book, with various pros and cons to each. Building a Second Brain is also an interesting technique, but is mor
16.
by laurowyn 3y ago
So the equivalent of: iptables -N eth0toeth1; iptables -P eth0toeth1 DROP; iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -j eth0toeth1; iptables -A eth0toeth1 -m tcp -p 80 -j ACCEPT; # add any more rules Or, as you say to avoid exponential combin
17.
by laurowyn 3y ago
except vbash drives those tools by generating configs. But this is my point; why is VyOS a distro when vbash could just be a package available to other distros?
18.
by laurowyn 3y ago
define zone based? If wanting internal and external subnets as "zones", iptables/nftables lets you match against incoming and outgoing interfaces. It would be trivial to make match against an incoming interface and jump to a
19.
by laurowyn 3y ago
If you want a web GUI, then pfSense or OPNSense are the general go tos. However, if you're comfortable with CLI and modifying configs in /etc/ then just running a bare metal Alpine Linux box is perfectly doable on a tiny box.
20.
by laurowyn 3y ago
Petition IEEE to change the title. Hacker news just parrots the original title. Them's the rules, always has been.
21.
by laurowyn 4y ago
Modern Effective C++ by Scott Meyers is my go to for people in this situation. I'm not sure if there's an even more recent edition that covers C++17 and C++20, but C++11/14 is definitely a great head start over C++03 and earl
22.
by laurowyn 5y ago
Somewhat agree, however I think it's because building redstone actually requires some materials science type knowledge. i.e. how different materials and physical structures affect the redstone signal. Redstone blocks vs redstone torche
23.
by laurowyn 5y ago
Pin all you want, if the repo/vendor/maintainer pulls the release then you're not getting access to your dependencies at all. If anything, this is the reason you use pull-through proxies. Your proxy will hold the version you
24.
by laurowyn 5y ago
> when developers also think about how the app will run, the outcomes will be the best Absolutely agree, but that becomes "engineering" in my view. I'm talking specifically about implementing functionality, not long term v
25.
by laurowyn 5y ago
>Kubernetes isn't always the right tool for the job, with which i agree, especially for smaller teams I think this is the key point. Kubernetes is great when used correctly, in the right scenario. And I feel that most of the hate co
26.
by laurowyn 5y ago
With no proof, yes it's a conspiracy theory. As others have stated, there is another app linked in the wiki article about EncroChat which was developed by the FBI, with evidence to back that up.
27.
by laurowyn 5y ago
So roll back to a previous version and start there. Android is open source. No reason a community couldn't fork it, maintain it and do what they want with it. Jailbreaking is also a thing. Modifying the OS enough to break through vendo
28.
by laurowyn 5y ago
But... That's exactly how computers work. If you had a look at EncroChat at all, you'd see that they were running a custom Android OS with a bunch of their own apps on it. Yes, we can take it to hardware level, however, that'
29.
by laurowyn 5y ago
Conspiracy theories aren't helpful.
30.
by laurowyn 5y ago
So we just gonna ignore the years it was used and unbroken? Now EncroChat is gone, I'm sure there's a few new ones out there in its place.

More ›