lauretas

6 ms·

1.
by lauretas 9y ago
"notabug.org"... interesting. Anyway, how does this compare, features-wise, with GNU Make? For example with make you have `./configure` files, do I also have them here?
2.
by lauretas 9y ago
License?
3.
by lauretas 9y ago
If they advertise a software as an "Anonymous Discussion Platform", the minimum standard that I think of is a P2P network built on top of GNUnet, Tor, or other similar networks.
4.
by lauretas 9y ago
What does "anonymous" mean in this context? Simply because I get to post a message without registering a nickname, it doesn't mean I'm anonymous...
5.
by lauretas 9y ago
RSS, email subscriptions (mailing lists), and content aggregators for specific topics like HN or www.freepo.st I used to read reddit years ago, but nowadays it's just too much noise and bad content (even the slower subreddits).
6.
by lauretas 9y ago
I think the idea behind the new "WebExtensions" is precisely "write once - run everywhere". But I don't know if this add-on is one of them.
7.
by lauretas 9y ago
How does this work? Where does the audio come from? Does it use some database of recorded IPA sounds, or does it convert from text to speech on the fly?
8.
by lauretas 9y ago
Is this add-on also available for Firefox?
9.
by lauretas 9y ago
[The reply]( https://freepo.st/post/xeipt6x9xu#comment-5l6f7qdlfk ).
10.
by lauretas 9y ago
Looks like GraphBrainz stands for "MusicBrainz + GraphQL". Unfortunately, this has nothing to do with RDF.
11.
by lauretas 9y ago
But it's not a "native" store. It's just a layer on top of other RDBMSes.
12.
by lauretas 9y ago
What about http://linkedbrainz.org ? Is it a dead project?
13.
by lauretas 9y ago
According to [this page]( https://neo4j.com/editions/ ) it's not. In fact, they are restricting important functionalities to their Enterprise Edition exclusively. Which means, the codebase is not the same.
14.
by lauretas 9y ago
So, are you saying that Neo4j is 100% free as in "100% AGPL, otherwise Commercial License if you don't want to use the AGPL"? In other words, the code is exactly the same, only with a different license?
15.
by lauretas 9y ago
I agree. This is not the point though, nor what I said.
16.
by lauretas 9y ago
The Enterprise Edition is not AGPL. It's under one of "Neo4j Commercial License", "Neo4j Evaluation License", "Neo4j Educational License", or "Fair Trade Licensing". In other words it's no
17.
by lauretas 9y ago
There isn't a lot of competition in the "free/libre database" market though. The only serious players are Jena/Fuseki (an RDF store) and Janus (a graph store).
18.
by lauretas 9y ago
No you're not the only one :) I quote 100% what you said. Also I think you don't hear much complaints simply because people quit GitLab once they try it and just move to GitHub instead (or something else for self hosting).
19.
by lauretas 9y ago
Is there anything like this for SPARQL endpoints?
20.
by lauretas 9y ago
Where do you get the data from?
21.
by lauretas 10y ago
> I'll move on to things like GitLab or IPFS for transmitting projects I'm working on. Or NotABug ( https://notabug.org ) which is a lot more friendlier toward open source projects. IPFS sounds good, I'd love to