latand6

7 ms·

1.
Show HN: Orchestrate parallel Claude Code and Codex agents on a live map(github.com)
4 points by latand6 2mo ago|0 comments
2.
by latand6 5mo ago
What the hell? If a company gets more efficient and uses fewer people - Microsoft's immediate reaction is to figure out how to invent some kind of digital seats so they can keep taxing the headcount. Lol
3.
by latand6 6mo ago
Yeah but I’m just really curious why so many people are so against improving the models. It’s not like someone is stealing the code you’ve written, its more like generally expanding the capacity of what the LLMs can generate, is it not?
4.
by latand6 6mo ago
So I can ask an LLM to write rust code to generate CAD designs???
5.
by latand6 6mo ago
Please don’t strawman me, I asked completely different question. It’s not about being grateful or something, but that many people (devs) are too concerned about their code being stolen as if they’ve come up with something unique and the LLM
6.
by latand6 6mo ago
Why won't people like to make the models better? Aren't we all getting the benefit after all?
7.
by latand6 6mo ago
good catch, yeah, I'm basically having a conversation with codex about each paper where it explains me the paper and answers my questions. I agree it's not the best way to do that, since the llms are prone to hallucinations, but i
8.
by latand6 6mo ago
Yeah I aim to facilitate the creation of useful skills by guiding the creators and in future - providing services for skills improvement. Think of automatic evals generation and security checks The other point is having real verified review
9.
by latand6 6mo ago
Thanks for the feedback and appreciation. Maybe at some point I’ll polish it and make it open source if people find this valuable
10.
by latand6 6mo ago
Isn’t what you’ve just described - the context bloat problem, the part about the web? I’m not sure I quite get the same experience as you with the “assumes steps it never took”. Do you think it’s because of the skills you’ve used? I also di
11.
by latand6 6mo ago
Got that, thanks for the advice, I'll ask my supervisor how to address that properly
12.
by latand6 6mo ago
Yeah that’s exactly my point. The AI is just taking the boring job of collecting evidence and I’m a validator. This way i see that I’m able to process papers much faster than without AI. It’s faster primarily because you don’t have to spend
13.
by latand6 6mo ago
There is not a single paragraph that I might “steal” from ChatGPT. I’m consistently using multiple LLMs to write, polish, rephrase and all other kinds of edits I really don’t get the point of the necessity of typing manually. Can you explai
14.
by latand6 6mo ago
I agree with you and that’s exactly what I’m going to do. It’s just that I may be more persuasive if I’m prepared
15.
by latand6 6mo ago
Can you really reproduce it though? I thought it’s the experiments that have to be able to reproduce, not the literature review
16.
by latand6 6mo ago
I’d be happy to disclose and even consider to share how I did it all I’ve even drafted the acknowledgment part with brief explanation of how I used AI tools The only part I’m concerned about is the stigma around the AI use and that it can b
17.
by latand6 6mo ago
I personally believe that the skills standard is pretty sufficient for extending LLMs’ knowledge. What we’re missing yet (and I’m working on) is a simple package manager for skills and a marketplace with some source of trust (real reviews,
18.
by latand6 6mo ago
I have completely different experience. Which models are you talking about? I have no trouble at all with AI documenting the steps it took. I use codex gpt5.4 and Claude code opus 4.6 daily. When needed - they have no issue with describing
19.
by latand6 6mo ago
Skills are repeatable workflows, that could be extracted as unit of work I guess
20.
by latand6 6mo ago
It's more - a SKILL can contain MCP :)
21.
by latand6 6mo ago
The difference I'm noticing is in that with a proper skill you can skip the process of LLM wandering about and trying to guess how to interact with an API or else. so they basically just save you time, even if they are 50% efficient of
22.
by latand6 6mo ago
Yeah, I've built my own skill-package manager as well btw! Then it clicked and I hyperfocused for a whole week and vibecoded a skill marketplace haha. Because the selling of a skill seems to sound like a new idea. going to write a show
23.
Ask HN: Is using AI tooling for a PhD literature review dishonest?
10 points by latand6 6mo ago|29 comments
24.
by latand6 6mo ago
Definitely, the whole point of openclaw is to operate on your data. It's just.. Be prepared to lose it I guess. The one thing I'm definitely not giving access to yet - the payments. I think we'll develop a way to handle that
25.
by latand6 6mo ago
Agree on the LLM part. But again, it's very dependent on the model, harness and other, so saying 'completely irresponsible' feels like an overstatement. I usually press 'allow all' every time and the productivity ga
26.
by latand6 6mo ago
I'm a heavy OpenClaw user and I've been testing it in many different scenarios — the profundity of what I can do with it now is crazy. It's literally automating my life. Being AuDHD, OpenClaw feels like a big relief. The posi
27.
by latand6 6mo ago
One thing I'd like to critisize - although I can agree that skill security is a real problem, but the solution is not to restrict yourself from using them, but to rely on the community: reviews, likes/dislikes, maybe having the sk
28.
by latand6 6mo ago
Yeah, that's the default way to approach it, but the cognitive load is still a problem. Manually reviewing every single skill I might need just for one task is tedious. GitHub stars won't give you any useful signal. I actually sta
29.
by latand6 6mo ago
A lot of the exhaustion comes from agents that improvise on every task. You give it a vague prompt, it takes a novel approach, you review it, half of it is wrong, you correct it, repeat. I started using and writing skills for the tasks exte
30.
Skills are quietly becoming the unit of agent knowledge
9 points by latand6 6mo ago|13 comments

More ›