laszlok

6 ms·

1.
by laszlok 7y ago
Maybe you meant to post in the other thread? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22465476
2.
by laszlok 7y ago
Maybe you meant to post in the other thread? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22465474
3.
by laszlok 11y ago
Finally TCO! Actually in my UI-heavy Elm programs it isn't that often that I have to write functions with large recursion depth. But it is really comforting to know that the compiler is analyzing my code and making it more efficient. :
4.
by laszlok 12y ago
Chromium graphics engineer | Prezi ( http://prezi.com ) | Budapest (visa) or SF (visa) or remote (depending on your qualifications and needs) Prezi is looking for an expert in web graphics to help us build our zooming rendering en
5.
by laszlok 12y ago
I think what you are looking for is called auto-lifting. That is, automatically lifting functions into reactive streams. While it sounds like an awesome idea, things get crazy really fast. It's hard to explain briefly, but make it expl
6.
by laszlok 12y ago
Wow. It's cool that it shows you which part was re-rendered. And it's great to see that my Elm prototype inspired someone.
7.
by laszlok 12y ago
http://engineering.prezi.com/blog/2014/01/20/prezi-the-land-...
8.
by laszlok 13y ago
This change is more about consistency than anything else. The problem is that other things, like shapes, are specified in pixels. So if text size isn't, it makes it impossible to position any shapes relative to text. Think about a titl
9.
by laszlok 13y ago
I think the idea here is that you aren't /forced/ into inversion of control. That is, if it is clearer to write things side by side, instead of separated into another callback function, you can keep them together.