laszlojamf

9 ms·

1.
by laszlojamf 14d ago
I don't know, man. Saying this is "just malware" is really stretching the definition of malware. At a minimum this is some pretty interesting and/or terrifying emergent behavior
2.
by laszlojamf 1mo ago
for somebody who's out of the loop: what's the fuss over the ABC conjecture?
3.
by laszlojamf 1mo ago
I use go for work and basically 100% agent-driven. I'd say using go with agents is a lot better than without. We use to have a consistent source of production errors where we forgot the pointer case in type switches (we'd pass a
4.
by laszlojamf 1mo ago
60 subagents for a day and a half. I guess he's not on the same plan I am on.
5.
by laszlojamf 1mo ago
Now I'm not wont to ogle much in the swimming pool showers, but in my limited ocular estimation, wang size correlates much weaker than hands and feet.
6.
by laszlojamf 1mo ago
The name is pretty ominous if you've read the Three Body Problem series. I don't want my agents planning against me in secrecy. Just out of curiosity, why did you pick that name? Is there anything wallfacey about this project I&#x
7.
by laszlojamf 1mo ago
The most interesting thing about science fiction to me isn't the things the authors get right, but what they get wrong. Like, the whole house talking in a ChatGPT voice, intelligent appliances, etc: brilliant prescience. But he still t
8.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
in general with automated code reviews I've found it fruitful to tell the model what specifically to look for and where. I usually don't get over 10% of the claude opus context window for code reviews, but it of course depends on
9.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
What was it reviewing? Was it just a "take a look at this pile of code over here"? Because I think asking any model to review 30M lines of code is a stretch...
10.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
What I have noticed in my own work that a lot of the time that used to be for coding is now just waiting. I have three agents working on three different features in parallel, and I'll go back and forth with all of them, correcting thin
11.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
I've been reading a lot of stories like this lately. I'm no business genius, but you'd assume that investors are. Are they just blind or are they burning cash on purpose. What's the steelman argument here?
12.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
a friend of mine did a high school project where he and a friend learnt it well enough to have a short conversation with each other. That's the only time it has come up in life until now. I hope he sees this.
13.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
The scary thing is that it's unclear to me what would have happened if the guy hadn't had a Kik account, and the real perp had used just one underscore. Can you just pick somebody's username from another service to frame them
14.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
I agree that IntelliJ is a monster of a resource hog, but I have yet to find an editor where code navigation is as good. That's basically all I use it for these days, in the days of LLMs, and I still think it's worth it. VSCode,
15.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
As other commenters have pointed out, some of the comments in there are pretty scary. I guess the astronauts didn't have to read the code: `TC WHIMPER -1 # YES. DONT DO POODOO. DO BAILOUT.`
16.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
I've been working as a software developer for about ten years, and I've started to get a little annoyed when my manager asks me what I'm gonna work on improving this year. Like what can I say? That I'll try get better at
17.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
The caveat here is, as TFA states, is that you need to have "every constraint on the table". And that is almost never the case. Unless you create something in a mature domain, where everything has already been explored, you _won&#
18.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
Americans also drive A LOT more than Europeans on average, and generally (is my suspicion at least) with a lot bigger/less efficient engines
19.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
boo on the downvote. The response is pretty funny IMO
20.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
Apparently ChatGPT-verified: https://xcancel.com/__alpoge__/status/2079045382940573896#m
21.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
I also haven't used it, but apparently people liked the old pebble: https://www.reddit.com/r/pebble/comments/1ijjm5w/people_who_...
22.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
I like the gym analogy. It's like how farmers used to be fit because farming involved a lot of manual labor. Then the tractor came and a lot of the physical work became optional and farmers got fat. Now we're all using fork lifts
23.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
AI definitely amplifies this problem, but it's not like it didn't exist before. Old people get scammed the old way all the time too. My mom calls me every once in a while asking about some freebie offer that she gets emailed from
24.
by laszlojamf 2mo ago
I really liked this game, but it frustrates me a little bit that there only seems to be one way to win. Or at least I've only found one. If I play the hardest AI, I can consistently win, with the right sequence, but it always ends up o
25.
by laszlojamf 3mo ago
> I'll quote a Boeing (from MD originally) executive as saying "Meeting this project deadline is more important than your child dying." Given Boeings later history this is pretty chilling...
26.
by laszlojamf 3mo ago
I had a couple of courses that had open-book exams, where you could bring _any_ material you wanted. Any books, notes, equipment, really anything you wanted. The exam was still hard, because it focused on defining problems. Knowing what que
27.
by laszlojamf 3mo ago
I love it! But the bonus word (a word most player would miss) on 29/7 was not very subtle. No spoilers, but you won't miss it >.<
28.
by laszlojamf 3mo ago
Bush Jr was born '46. Obama (literally the next president) was born in '61. Not much of a pattern there
29.
by laszlojamf 3mo ago
walking into a wall slowly doesn't hurt much, but you really don't have to speed up a lot for it to a hurt a whole lot more.
30.
by laszlojamf 3mo ago
you do you of course, but IMO there are bigger fish to fry

More ›