l332mn

7 ms·

1.
by l332mn 3mo ago
Mind sharing your setup? I also have dual 3090s, but getting nowhere close to 300k context limits with 4 bit quantized models at that size (using vllm).
2.
by l332mn 7mo ago
I don't work with Java projects, but I just give it access to the basic binaries it needs, though I reserve some commands for myself.
3.
by l332mn 7mo ago
I use bubblewrap to sandbox the agent to my projects folder, where the ai gets free read/write reign. Non-synthetic env cars are symlinked into my projects folder from outside that folder.
4.
by l332mn 5y ago
The most credible theory in my eyes as to why they needed to invade Iraq, was that Saddam intended to boycott the US dollar, and rather sell Iraq's oil in Euros. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/feb&#
5.
by l332mn 5y ago
> To state that the speed of light is the same only because the relative time is variable for respective observers is unconvincing Not sure what you mean by relative time?
6.
by l332mn 5y ago
I'm sure your experience is valid, but you haven't established that most of what is produced in China is very bad . That's an exaggeration. The very fact that your company manufacture in China means at the very least that
7.
by l332mn 5y ago
> Is it also political propaganda to show a patch of the Japanese flag? In combination with Taiwan, of course it is. Why don't you think it is? The history here is that Japan had criminally occupied Taiwan for half a century, and on
8.
by l332mn 5y ago
> at the same time the quality of most things is very bad What an ignorant thing to say. China generally produces high quality stuff, for their own population as well as for the entire world.
9.
by l332mn 5y ago
In Saudia Arabia the people are basically on universal basic income. In Norway on the other hand, the oil profits are all invested into the pension fund, which is very sparingly used for any other purpose.
10.
by l332mn 5y ago
They apparently don't like foreigners pushing political propaganda into the games they play. Tbh, I think the fact that the Pentagon are basically brainwashing kids through games like Call of Duty deserves more attention. Some modern A
11.
by l332mn 5y ago
As a mathematician, I can't recommend "Categories for the Working Mathematician" enough, written by the (co)creator of category theory himself.
12.
by l332mn 5y ago
Why would I reverse statements that are made on the basis of facts and research, of leaks and serious news reporting? Wikileaks is a thing for example, look it up. Not sure why you choose to refuse doing research into the topic and ignore e
13.
by l332mn 5y ago
That's an odd, but unfortunately not uncommon, way of forming convictions. What are you unconvinced about? You openly admit that instead of uncomfortable information triggering your curiosity, it strengthens your already made up convic
14.
by l332mn 5y ago
It's tough to admit, but these are the bare facts.
15.
by l332mn 5y ago
China will probably become much better than Norway, New Zealand and Switzerland once they increase their GDP. They have made major strides already despite their relatively low GDP per capita. The US is the only country committing genocide.
16.
by l332mn 5y ago
But China is better than the US in all of those things. They don't wage war, they have better health care (no massive drug monopoly charging obscene prices for cheap insulin), higher life expectancy, way fewer people in jail per capita
17.
by l332mn 5y ago
Who's the main currency manipulator? The US, and its many, many trillions of dollars in debt which other countries are forced to purchase in order to participate in the global market. As long as the dollar remains the world reserve cur
18.
by l332mn 5y ago
Care to give some examples of when this has happened?
19.
by l332mn 5y ago
This is how American propaganda works, not only to support the Afghanistan war, but to support US imperialist foreign policy in general. It's extremely manipulative, but also effective at controlling the narrative, in a 1984-esque fash
20.
by l332mn 5y ago
Afghanistan and the USSR were on good terms, and had signed a treaty which included military assistance. The USSR was called upon to assist Afghanistan to contain uprisings. However, only after the Soviet-friendly leader of Afghanistan was
21.
by l332mn 5y ago
> Both systems can and do commit huge amounts of resources to pointless, destructive forever-wars. Only in capitalist systems is this a process of enrichment of the ruling class. The transfer of wealth in the US to the richest % on the b
22.
by l332mn 5y ago
The USSR did not have a bourgeoisie nor a "local equivalent" thereof.
23.
by l332mn 5y ago
How? The planned economic system of USSR means that wartime production is a net economic loss serving no financial purpose. In contrast with the capitalist system, where war serves as a basis for the transfer of capital to the war profiteer
24.
by l332mn 5y ago
America's invasion. BRI wasn't a thing back then. Also, the USSR was invited by the Afghanistan government to contain a rebellion, it wasn't an aggressive (imperialist) invasion.
25.
by l332mn 5y ago
Over a 100 years ago this was part of Lenins analysis of capitalism, and the closely connected aspect of imperialism, both military and economic. This is not new, it has been a central part of a Marxist (in particular Marxism Leninism) unde
26.
by l332mn 5y ago
That's not really the issue. The three body problem does have an analytical solution in the form of a power series, but the problem is that it converges so slowly to be of any practical use.
27.
by l332mn 5y ago
Of course it is racist. I'm not sure if it was the Winnie the pooh, I assumed it was due to its prevalence and how the article described it as a cartoon depicting stereotyped features (yellow skin).
28.
by l332mn 5y ago
First of all, that statistic is not about household emissions, but emissions in total (production only perhaps). On the other hand, it doesn't include all types of household emissions either, because it doesn't account for the ent
29.
by l332mn 5y ago
The paradox of the situation is that population levels is mostly correlated with consumption levels. Which means that lowering population by natural means implies much higher emissions in total. Population levels are tied to economic condit
30.
by l332mn 5y ago
Emissions from household consumption is so much more than simply burning fossil fuel for energy, which amounts to only about 20% in total.

More ›