kyle6884

5 ms·

1.
by kyle6884 4y ago
NAPA Auto Parts | REMOTE (US/CA) | https://www.napaonline.com/accessories NAPA Auto Parts is seeking a fully remote Ruby on Rails developer. You’ll be working on a smaller team that is rapidly building a new division w
2.
by kyle6884 5y ago
Genuine Parts Company | REMOTE (US/CA) | https://www.napaonline.com/accessories Genuine Parts Company (NAPA Auto Parts) is seeking a fully remote Ruby on Rails developer. You’ll be working on a smaller team that is rap
3.
by kyle6884 7y ago
http://charleyproject.org/case/william-earl-moldt says he disappeared while the the gated community was under development
4.
by kyle6884 7y ago
if you have a mac, why not start out with garageBand? It's actually quite capable and it's free!
5.
by kyle6884 7y ago
but not the E in Made ;)
6.
by kyle6884 7y ago
Your comment reminded me of a Doug DeMuro article where he did just that! "In other words: the Range Rover is a highly capable, brilliant off-roading vehicle with a lot of highly capable, brilliant off-roading components, assuming that
7.
by kyle6884 9y ago
+1 for bourbon; been using it for a little over a year now, and love it over Bootstrap
8.
by kyle6884 10y ago
heh, google cached version: http://goo.gl/hRUKyu
9.
by kyle6884 10y ago
This may work nicely for a subscription business where you have 2 weeks to identify problematic orders. But what about everyone else? Should we silently fail on orders where a customer accidentally mistyped their CC#? Imagine all the extra
10.
by kyle6884 10y ago
Completely agree with fweespee_ch. Major CC processors such as Authorize.net, Braintree, etc. offer fraud protection measures but in our experience they do very little to prevent even a remotely-capable fraudster. Typical features offered a
11.
How Google Works: A Google Ranking Engineer's Story(youtube.com)
6 points by kyle6884 10y ago|1 comments
12.
by kyle6884 11y ago
Might be a good idea to put a canonical tag on the old to the new content. http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/1.02/crypto.rebels_pr... > http://www.wired.com/1993/02/crypto-
13.
by kyle6884 11y ago
you could add an additional URL parameter via pushState and ensure that you're defining the canonical tag only to the main data pages. You could also define the new parameter in webmaster tools and tell googlebot to ignore it
14.
by kyle6884 12y ago
Exactly +1
15.
by kyle6884 12y ago
Excellent point Greg, the article does address this though: check the "U/X vs. Googlebot/X" section
16.
Well-intentioned websites get caught in Google’s algorithmic penalty box(seerinteractive.com)
56 points by kyle6884 12y ago|29 comments
17.
by kyle6884 12y ago
Another Chicagoan here, I'm actually the exact opposite. I'd much rather have my package sitting in the lobby of my apartment than going down to Michigan Ave, dealing with a bunch of tourists, and waiting in line to pick up, idk,
18.
by kyle6884 12y ago
yep, gotta love the black text shadow on black text ;)
19.
by kyle6884 12y ago
ha!
20.
by kyle6884 12y ago
Is anyone else sick of these interruption articles? We get it; writing code requires focus, interruptions are bad. Etc. Etc. Can't that be said about most tasks that take any type of focus?
21.
by kyle6884 13y ago
This. Search for a product in google shopping and multiple merchants will be clustered around one product image that is chosen from 1 of the merchants. That's the main reason, but it also avoids the ugliness of an ebay search where s
22.
Ask HN: VOIP suggestions for e-commerce site?
2 points by kyle6884 15y ago|0 comments
23.
by kyle6884 16y ago
ah, my bad guys, missed that ;(
24.
by kyle6884 16y ago
See "Major Supporters" http://www.w3.org/Consortium/sup
25.
W3.org Paid Links for only $2500-$10000 **edit Nofollowed**(w3.org)
16 points by kyle6884 16y ago|13 comments
26.
by kyle6884 16y ago
Agreed, if the average-user only knew how prevalent this is. We're an e-commerce site and constantly feel in the minority for not buying links exactly like JCP did. Almost all of our top competitors do the exact same thing and have gotten
27.
by kyle6884 16y ago
Not to mention link building via satellite site networks. A competitor of ours has hundreds of keyword-niche sites that link back to their URL but also link to several other legitimate domains on each page. How could Google penalize the do
28.
by kyle6884 16y ago
The Stack Overflow article seems to address the subject of content being scrapped and republished which is certainly a big issue. What about the equally concerning issue of the overwhelming amount of "fluff" content published with the sole
29.
by kyle6884 16y ago
Hey moultano, what about specific sites within an industry that abuse big time with doorway pages and link farms? How can we report that to you? IN SERPs these domains are technically relevant to the search-term, but only show up high in th