kumarhn

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kumarhn 5mo ago

   EDEN is clearly relevant prior work for HIGGS. But reducing HIGGS to “an extension of EDEN” seems unfair to the authors of HIGGS. Similar primitive, different problem setting, different constraints, different contribution. Curious: where do
2. 2.▲
   by kumarhn 5mo ago

   TurboQuant is starting to look like a case study in how to turn a fragile paper into a breakthrough story. The attribution is thin, the “6x compression” headline is not clearly separated from prior KV-cache quantization baselines like KIVI,
3. 3.▲
   by kumarhn 5mo ago

   TurboQuant looks like it has very serious research integrity issues. https://openreview.net/forum?id=tO3ASKZlok