ktm5j

4 ms·

1.
by ktm5j 5d ago
Worst thing that's ever happened to me is having processes randomly killed by the OOM killer. Could be unpleasant if you're writing an email or document that suddenly disappears because your app got killed.
2.
by ktm5j 5d ago
Well if one reads my comment I'll consider apologizing.
3.
by ktm5j 5d ago
Sometimes you guys think too much..
4.
by ktm5j 5d ago
Is that really an important detail? I think what I said got my point across.
5.
by ktm5j 5d ago
As someone who supports some bottom of the barrel "regular users".. they aren't monkeys. They have brains that function enough to process "oh, I shouldn't do that again".
6.
by ktm5j 16d ago
Also, the one thing that's important above all else in industrial automation is reliability. If your LLM doesn't know about one tiny little detail that ends up causing your product to fail, your customers start losing money and yo
7.
by ktm5j 19d ago
They aren't specifically supporting terrorism, and in fact are cooperating with the US to stop terrorist groups. This isn't an ends justifies the means situation, as I was trying to illustrate with the oxygen/atmosphere metap
8.
by ktm5j 19d ago
My point is, most people are looking for strategies that actually make sense. Shutting down Google to stop terrorism, even when Google is already cooperating with the US government, makes no sense.
9.
by ktm5j 19d ago
Removing all the oxygen from our atmosphere would kill 100% of terrorists, that's a good strategy too right?
10.
by ktm5j 19d ago
All the providers you mention here work with the US government in situations where their platforms are being used by terrorist organizations. It sounds like the a/i folks are specifically offering free services to a militant group, so
11.
by ktm5j 20d ago
Okay dude, whatever you say.
12.
by ktm5j 21d ago
Right back at you. You're the one acting like you know that my motives are unkind as if you know me and my sense of humor, you're the one who's offbase here buddy. By the way, a girl called you sensitive.
13.
by ktm5j 21d ago
what was rude? I was just being cheeky guys, yeesh.. yall need to lighten up.
14.
by ktm5j 21d ago
If you think I'm being unkind then I think you're abnormally sensitive.
15.
by ktm5j 21d ago
Well what I said wasn't really against you either, I was just being cheeky.
16.
by ktm5j 22d ago
You took a look at 5 posts made on one single day and then categorized all of the other days.. seems like you're good at categorizing with a broad brush yourself. Based on my experience as a pretty heavy HN consumer, I'm with the
17.
by ktm5j 22d ago
What exactly is the complaint? They haven't even made that clear is my point.
18.
by ktm5j 23d ago
It's not their job to cater to your nitpicking. Even if this Google form didn't work over a VPN (which it totally does), you're capable of turning the VPN off if you really want to submit feedback. But it doesn't even so
19.
by ktm5j 23d ago
But weight/mass didn't change one bit (okay exaggeration, but not by much), so maybe peppermint helps relieve gas. Who knows? There's a lot that this data could mean, and no simple way to figure it out.
20.
by ktm5j 23d ago
I could (sort of) see why you might get this upset if people were required to have a Google account themselves to submit this Google form, but that's not the case. Who are you to tell an underfunded opensource dev company that just l
21.
by ktm5j 23d ago
I'm so glad we have you and your googling skills to assure us that this is nothing to worry about.
22.
by ktm5j 23d ago
Calling a book pirated is a legal issue. If the courts bless the idea of AI companies donating the books then there is no legal issue, and I wrong? The point of my last comment is that I don't think either of us are qualified to act li
23.
by ktm5j 23d ago
Do you really think AI companies are seeking out outdated/unpopular books to train their models on?
24.
by ktm5j 26d ago
So you're a lawyer and a librarian now? If a library really won't take the books for whatever reason you're imagining, I'm sure there are other organizations that would.
25.
by ktm5j 26d ago
> The AI training isn't borrowing from libraries and returning from libraries Perhaps that's an important distinction here, I was really just trying to explain what I thought the commenter was trying to say. Calm down with the
26.
by ktm5j 26d ago
Questions don't imply anything, you're just asking things. I don't have the answers to your questions, but the point is that Google was able to scan books without destroying them while still avoiding legal consequences (with
27.
by ktm5j 26d ago
Considering their position, I wouldn't trust a damn thing that memory manufacturers say right now. They're the ones taking advantage of the increased demand by increasing prices.
28.
by ktm5j 26d ago
I think you're missing the point. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure they're trying to point out that this book scanning doesn't need to be destructive. I'm not sure if AI companies are using a scanning metho
29.
by ktm5j 27d ago
We don't necessarily have to draw that line right now, we're talking about lice. Also, there is no way that dolphins are incapable of emotions, when my dog is capable of emotions. I know there's some disagreement on that subj
30.
by ktm5j 28d ago
Why would you have empathy for something that is literally incapable of things like empathy. Or any kind of emotion or thought. This is ridiculous guys, you might as well have empathy for a rock.

More ›