ksk

6 ms·

1.
by ksk 6y ago
>It depends on the person and the situation. Wouldn't you agree? Exactly. However people seem reluctant to grant this to Trump supporters. They seem to be always lumped together as evil racists.
2.
by ksk 6y ago
The pfizer vaccine also elicits T Cell response/cell mediated immunity. I'm guessing there are a few more studies in the pipeline..
3.
by ksk 6y ago
>When the root causes are massive delusion, indulging in ridiculous conspiracy theories, general resentment that other people want to be treated fairly, cult-of-personality-like worship of a dictator, etc. Then unfortunately the root-cau
4.
by ksk 6y ago
I will take that link at face value, so Trump is just as bad as Obama? Great, they're both loathsome in my book. Count me in. :) >He was banned for inciting violence using Twitter's platform. He supposedly incited people with h
5.
by ksk 6y ago
>I'll prognosticate that the close compatriots of the violent insurrectionists who are currently enjoying three hots and a cot courtesy of the US Government will almost certainly engage in more violent acts. Probably fairly soon. I
6.
by ksk 6y ago
100% agree, these social media companies with their fake empathy and double standards are not fooling anyone.
7.
by ksk 6y ago
So Obama, Biden, Bush, et. al. should be banned too for all the completely unnecessary wars/drone strikes that killed civilians?? Or is killing civilians sometimes accepted? This move is entirely political, Twitter should just man up a
8.
by ksk 6y ago
Of course there was obstruction from Trump - he has the personality of a mob boss. That doesn't shock me. I'm talking about owning up to the fact that he legitimately won a fair election in 2016.
9.
by ksk 6y ago
>That Russia helped Trump is generally agreed upon. It is only agreed upon when you don't talk to people outside of your own echo chamber. In 2016, people were just shocked that so many people could vote for a loathsome person like
10.
by ksk 6y ago
>wanting to try to tackle a problem where millions of people of this country can’t be trusted to personally vet what they read/watch online? Yeah, I don't trust them to do anything remotely competent here. They've happily
11.
by ksk 6y ago
Wait, are you seriously claiming Trump won because of Russia? Or do you agree that the ridiculous Russia narrative pushed by Dems was total BS? Here is a nice article on the whole situation: https://taibbi.substack.com/p&#x2
12.
by ksk 6y ago
Which subreddit got banned for promoting the nonsense Steele dossier, and other ridiculous Trump conspiracies like the pee tape?
13.
by ksk 6y ago
> I’m sure a lot of these employees are trying to do _something_ to try to remove whatever it is that is causing these people to lose all sense of reality. I guess they were asleep for the past four years. Gotta impress the new boss and
14.
by ksk 6y ago
Its the usual political BS that comes out of there. We don't need this "political insight" from a surveillance/advertising company that makes money by tricking you into clicking on an ad or convincing you to buy some tri
15.
by ksk 6y ago
No, what I'm saying is not up for debate is the fact that control gets shared when you take someone else's money. Its a known framework in which everyone operates. Your "shareholders are known for" is simply a BS talking
16.
by ksk 6y ago
Yeah, that's how the game works. Its like democracy - people can and do vote for idiots. When you accept outside funding in exchange for shares, control gets shared. Honestly, do we really need to debate this?
17.
by ksk 6y ago
You're right - that is a misunderstanding. I think you accidentally replied to the wrong comment seeing as I didn't say or imply that.
18.
by ksk 6y ago
Of course, why would anyone oppose it. But, we only have limited funds/time/political capital, etc. I think we should give top priority to healthcare/education/jobs/, and use the remaining funds to address other iss
19.
by ksk 6y ago
Why is that so bad? Shareholders are the owners of the company.
20.
by ksk 6y ago
>The default state of a human is an agnostic. If you are born and nobody tells you the Good Word, you live your entire life without religion. There are some interesting arguments that we evolved to become hard-wired for religion. Fear du
21.
by ksk 6y ago
> if I take your position that racism in policing doesn't exist, and that the police are treating everyone equally: Please don't do this. Its obvious OP didn't even remotely mean or say this. They clearly said that there i
22.
by ksk 6y ago
Its happening everywhere, in every political arena. I'm hearing very similar things happening in other countries as well. The hilarious part is every political side believing they are the only ones with facts. It sort of reminds me of
23.
by ksk 6y ago
Saying there was absolutely zero fraud in this election is inaccurate, but saying the election was "stolen" is inaccurate as well. Every election has irregularities - most of it is people making honest mistakes on forms. As is typ
24.
by ksk 6y ago
Its mostly aesthetics. It could be useful if you come back to a game after a break and you forget some of the keys. I can see its use as a training mode too.
25.
by ksk 6y ago
Another cool usage is to light up specific keys based on the current application. This is quite useful in things like games or editors. You can have green for movement, white for actions, etc.
26.
by ksk 6y ago
>* Establish a network of "Research Universities" from each country in the World (sort of UN of Universities). The poorer countries can be partially funded by richer countries. This is to ensure that knowledge flows are not con
27.
by ksk 6y ago
> If you're a great fundraiser, why do you even need the University? Because funds don't cover certain operational costs. You also lease lab space/equipment/staff from the university, etc. Everyone can identify proble
28.
by ksk 6y ago
We don't know how effective the vaccines will be, and we have no data on long-term immunity. Its a bit early to celebrate :)
29.
by ksk 6y ago
It's a bit like getting fired from a job (w/o recognition) or rejected at an interview, and then proceeding to do exceedingly well in life. Happens very rarely, but you do tend to hear about the famous cases. Good for that person,
30.
by ksk 6y ago
Please note that the [1] NIH, for e.g., does fund speculative/exploratory research. You will not however, get unlimited funding. So if you fail to show at-least something you probably wont get renewed. There isn't a perfect fu

More ›