kseniamorph

5 ms·

1.
by kseniamorph 4mo ago
don't undervote me....it's a joke
2.
by kseniamorph 4mo ago
It's worrying because it feels like a loss of control. But there must be control. And this what responsibility is. You should worry only about people who don't understand responsibility, not AI-inspired ones
3.
Microsoft's AI system tops Anthropic's Mythos on cybersecurity benchmark(geekwire.com)
2 points by kseniamorph 4mo ago|0 comments
4.
by kseniamorph 5mo ago
Co-author here. We collected 90 public signals from employee reviews and social media describing the organizational impact of post-acquisition cost extraction at CDK in the year before the attack. The question we’re interested in is the fol
5.
CDK before BlackSuit: 90 signals on what $5.8B in acquisition debt looked like(counterpartywatch.substack.com)
4 points by kseniamorph 5mo ago|1 comments
6.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
> nothing but thieves! cool band btw
7.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
there is a real one though — https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/claude-code-sandboxing . needs to be enabled with /sandbox, not on by default.
8.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
i feel like moves like this make it even harder for new open-source tools to break through. there's already evidence that LLMs are biased toward established tools in their training data (you can check it here https://amplify
9.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
wow, not bad result on the computer use benchmark for the mini model. for example, Claude Sonnet 4.6 shows 72.5%, almost on par with GPT-5.4 mini (72.1%). but sonnet costs 4x more on input and 3x more on output
10.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
given specification approach: personally i found it useful in some cases to write preceding block-comments for functions. you can describe the desired behaviour there, input/output types, etc. you can even make a skeleton from comment
11.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
i like how this research (and others related) kind of supports the idea that free will might be lacking. I still keep a pinch of skepticism about this idea, understanding that it's just a concept. But personally i like it, because it e
12.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
I remember reading a CF blog post about crawler separation and responsible AI bot principles where they argue every bot should have one distinct purpose. Now they're building crawling infrastructure themselves, and their own /craw
13.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
they are seeking talent, not buying the product. this is a valid strategy for devs - just to attract attention no matter what.
14.
by kseniamorph 6mo ago
Curious whether people here see value in this kind of research: using alternative public data to assess vendor risk before a breach, rather than after. We're aware that "we found signals before a known breach" is a weaker cla
15.
TCS had a perfect security score. Then M&S and JLR were breached(counterpartywatch.substack.com)
7 points by kseniamorph 6mo ago|1 comments
16.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
This matches what I've seen too. Though I'd add another dimension: soft skills. In my experience, job searching has always been easier for people who communicate well regardless of their technical level. And soft skills might be w
17.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
Saw the edit: I think that clarification was important. The core point resonates with me personally. The shift isn't about writing less code, it's about where the real judgment lives. Knowing what to build, how to decompose a prob
18.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
makes sense, but i'd separate two things: models converging in ability vs hitting a fundamental ceiling. what we're probably seeing is the current training recipe plateauing — bigger model, more tokens, same optimizer. that would
19.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
Curious about the baseline choice. modded-nanogpt was optimized for wall-clock speed, not data efficiency, so it seems like an unusual reference point for this kind of benchmark. Why not vanilla NanoGPT?
20.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
oh it reminds me of all these claims regarding "bad" TV shows, "bad" songs, "bad" movies, etc. i understand that AI gives you a deeper feeling of interaction, but let's be honest - if you have a mental ill
21.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
> We heard feedback that GPT‑5.2 Instant would sometimes refuse questions it should be able to answer safely, or respond in ways that feel overly cautious or preachy, particularly around sensitive topics. Lol it won't solve the issu
22.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
Is there anyone who really understands what’s different about the OpenAI agreement? Or maybe these are just Sam Altman’s public statements that don’t actually reflect the real terms of the deal. I honestly can’t figure it out.
23.
Trump tells government to stop using Anthropic's AI systems(nbcnews.com)
13 points by kseniamorph 7mo ago|4 comments
24.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
Wtf is going on
25.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
The self-reinforcing effect here was somewhat predictable given how LLMs are trained. The more repositories and AI blogs recommend the same tools, the more those patterns get locked in through training data. This makes market entry increasi
26.
Ransomware groups switch to stealthy attacks and long-term access(csoonline.com)
2 points by kseniamorph 7mo ago|0 comments
27.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
disagree. at least i can see the quality of research coming out of Anthropic, which tells me these people are interested in what they're doing. i don't see this level of scientific rigor in OpenAI
28.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
The comparison feels off to me. The Maker Movement was an actual movement with a shared ideology of self-transformation through building. People identified with it. Vibe coding is just a description of a practice. The term covers a broad r
29.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
> The policy change is separate and unrelated to Anthropic’s discussions with the Pentagon, according to a source familiar with the matter. ok lol what a coincidence. but setting aside the conspiracy. the article actually spells out the
30.
by kseniamorph 7mo ago
I'm not sure the practical implications are as dramatic as the paper suggests. Most adversaries who would want to deanonymize people at scale (governments, corporations) already have access to far more direct methods. The people most a

More ›