ksclarke

20 ms·

1.
by ksclarke 4mo ago
I'd buy that in a second.
2.
by ksclarke 9mo ago
The corporation's risk assessment department has calculated it's more cost effective to deny and then fight the consequences in court vs. spend the extra money up front?
3.
by ksclarke 9mo ago
That first sentence I believe. The second not so much.
4.
by ksclarke 10mo ago
Some become President of the United States. Others probably grow out of it?
5.
by ksclarke 11mo ago
The whole time I was reading this, as someone from the U.S., I was wondering what country the writer was from, because it sure as #$@! wasn't written by someone in the U.S. When I got to that part, I was, "Oh. Okay. That makes sen
6.
by ksclarke 11mo ago
https://www.jsoniq.org -- jq is ubiquitous, but I still prefer the jsoniq syntax.
7.
by ksclarke 2y ago
Looking at the number of points and comments on each (including this one), I remember something my mom (an elementary school teacher) always said: "You have to repeat something three times before people hear it."
8.
by ksclarke 3y ago
Yes, but they're the smaller of the two groups.
9.
by ksclarke 3y ago
Ha, "wallet garden" gave me a good chuckle. I usually hear it expressed as a "walled garden", but this might be the perfect typo (or clever twist / word play). I'm guessing it was a typo, but well done nonethel
10.
by ksclarke 3y ago
Because people (i.e., users) aren't the same thing as developers. Most people just want to use a tool, rather than develop it.
11.
by ksclarke 5y ago
And, of potential interest to the HN crowd, those one million newly digitized images are also available for programmatic access from Yale's IIIF ( https://iiif.io/api/image/3.0/ ) API endpoint. So, for ins
12.
by ksclarke 7y ago
> “Good spam” is just real content. Harvested and put on somebody else's site that is covered with ads.
13.
by ksclarke 7y ago
That's not where all its success came from. That's the one downfall the article got right. It was successful before that. Trying to shoehorn a bunch of people who didn't want to use it into using it was the mistake. It was do