krstf13

6 ms·

1.
by krstf13 3y ago
Not to be rude. The live playground probably can’t run elixir/erlang code. And it most certainly cannot connect to a remote running node instance. It’s unfortunate, that the angle here is documentation since, while Livebooks are great
2.
by krstf13 3y ago
While Livebook will mostly have an appeal for people already working with erlang/elixir, it does have a few features that are pretty nice. - it’s collaborative (think Google docs for code) when several people are working on the same in
3.
by krstf13 4y ago
So? Laravel uses type hinting, ok. This has absolutely nothing to do with your previous post grossly misrepresenting a talk. You hadn’t even mentioned Laravel in it. Type hinting is not equivalent to a static type system, which is what the
4.
by krstf13 4y ago
You’re misrepresenting what’s being said in this talk (the relevant part of the talk is around the 15 minute mark at : https://youtu.be/XzAupUHiryg ). The tldr was that they had patched some of the library code without cons
5.
by krstf13 4y ago
That’s very likely. In a past life I’ve done a bunch of auditing for m and a, apart the obvious nepotistic paid internships more often than not people thought to be unproductive were really important to the organisation. Think about payrol
6.
by krstf13 4y ago
He talked about it at length at the most recent elixir conf eu : https://youtu.be/Jf5Hsa1KOc8 .But it might never materialise.
7.
by krstf13 4y ago
Wouldn’t storing the deleted data in an immutable storage, with time stamp, be much better for auditability ? I mean how could you audit deleted, restored and deleted again data with that setup? Also, while I know it’s not really accurate,
8.
by krstf13 6y ago
This is, so far, an excellent write up. The motivation section is great, it’s clear, acknowledges that the C version is probably fine and simply states the authors wanted to gain more insights into the process of porting C code. If the res
9.
by krstf13 6y ago
Also, you lie and move the goal posts. You really should say that you don’t wanna pay your employees. Fine by me, but be frank about it. I know I’ll be downvoted here, but the truth is this guy doesn’t want to pay his employees and pretends
10.
by krstf13 6y ago
Nope,that’s not correct. Even in English health insurance is not tax, unemployment insurance is not tax... And by the way what you call ‘charges’ is historically‘cotisations’ (fees).
11.
by krstf13 6y ago
To add to what the parent wrote, depending on your situation (eg unemployment) when your creating your micro-company, you get a grace period (up to 2 years, I believe) during which your fees are substantially reduced. And the fees include s
12.
by krstf13 6y ago
This is grossly inaccurate. What you're calling taxes, are fees that allow employee to get several benefits. Practically speaking, these are delayed salary. They include social security, unemployment benefits, retirement benefits, trai
13.
by krstf13 7y ago
You can say publicly that a court decision was politically motivated. What matters is how it is said and somewhat by whom (a member of the government might be held to higher standards).
14.
by krstf13 7y ago
This can’t be for real and isn’t. It is illegal to try to criticise a court decision in a way that is designed to impede the justice system and/or to interfere with the independence of the judiciary.
15.
by krstf13 7y ago
The article is misleading, it’s not what the law says. The law specifically forbids the use of personally identifiable data (ie judges and clerks name) to conduct statistical analysis predictions. This seems to be in line with the privacy
16.
by krstf13 7y ago
This is not what the law says. In France, judgements are anonymized before being published, however the name of the judges and their teams are kept. The law says that the names of the judges cannot be used to predict or analyse decisions f
17.
by krstf13 8y ago
I don’t think it’s a valid comparison though because market sizes aren’t the same and because viewing GDPR as a free speech is far from obvious (it actually requires yogi master like bending abilities) You could argue that anti hate speech
18.
by krstf13 8y ago
EU is 500M people Saudi Arabia is 40M Also, GDPR doesn’t ‘almost definitely violates the first amendment’, GDPR wasn’t passed by Congress. A GDPR-like rule might violate the first amendment if you allow a really extensive definition of spe
19.
by krstf13 9y ago
My understanding is that these new policies apply to videos, not paid for ads. Maybe these ads are actually an answer to these policies? What I find disturbing is that you could watch the whole ad (in the Polish case) and never know who ra
20.
Ask HN: Are state sponsored ads on YouTube a new thing?
2 points by krstf13 9y ago|2 comments
21.
by krstf13 9y ago
You should use HTML.parser and focus on the conversion to markdown. The way you parse HTML in the convert function is very inefficient and can easily produce incorrect results with valid HTML (e.g. <p class="some>stuff">s