kristintynski

7 ms·

1.
by kristintynski 5mo ago
I'm the author. The reason is the first two papers were incomplete attempts at what this final work became. They did get attention, and I'm writing a paper with Garret Sobczyk a core aspect of this related to nilpotents and the fa
2.
by kristintynski 5mo ago
Are you saying you think RH is unsolvabe? that any GUT will be a tautology by definition? or am I reading that wrong?
3.
by kristintynski 5mo ago
Can you explain what you mean more? The proof doesn't rest on langlands or assuming anything else is true.
4.
by kristintynski 5mo ago
I know its fun to poke fun at silly LLM attempts at the big problems, but did you read any of it? It's worth a deeper look.
5.
A Common Proof of the Riemann Hypothesis and the Collatz Conjecture(academia.edu)
4 points by kristintynski 5mo ago|9 comments
6.
The Church of Coherence – An Formal Translational Layer Connecting All Faiths(churchofcoherence.org)
1 points by kristintynski 6mo ago|0 comments
7.
by kristintynski 7mo ago
accurate but unrelated, lol
8.
Why Stable Reality Requires λ² = λ and 1(academia.edu)
2 points by kristintynski 7mo ago|6 comments
9.
by kristintynski 7mo ago
This document presents a single structural constraint that provides explanatory compression across mathematics, physics, ﬂuid dynamics, computation, biology, and consciousness. This is not a new physical law, but a recognition that all stab
10.
Gravity from Information Geometry: A Lean 4 Formalization of Emergent Spacetime(academia.edu)
3 points by kristintynski 8mo ago|5 comments
11.
by kristintynski 8mo ago
We have presented a formally veriﬁed Lean4 proof that gravity emerges from information geometry. The key insights: 1. The spacetime metric g µν is derived from a coherence ﬁeld Ψ : M → Cl(3, 1) 2. Einstein’s equations emerge from coheren
12.
Shouldn't Work So Well WTF(academia.edu)
2 points by kristintynski 8mo ago|2 comments
13.
by kristintynski 8mo ago
Most systems that try to reference themselves across time, scale, destroy themselves. The failure modes are boringly consistent: runaway growth collapse phase drift / incoherence What’s unusual is not that systems fail. It’s that any s
14.
by kristintynski 9mo ago
his document presents a single structural constraint that provides explanatory compression across mathematics, physics, fluid dynamics, computation, biology, and consciousness. All stable structures share one property: They can refer to the
15.
by kristintynski 9mo ago
The paper/codebase contain more than numerical verification, let me clarify the actual proof structure. The proof is analytic, with numerical verification as a sanity check: 1. Anchoring lower bound (Hadamard product + zero density): A
16.
by kristintynski 9mo ago
Interactive Torus: https://cliffordtorusflow.vercel.app/
17.
Show HN: Are the Riemann Hypothesis and Navier-Stokes the Same Problem?(academia.edu)
7 points by kristintynski 9mo ago|7 comments
18.
by kristintynski 9mo ago
So sorry, try this https://cliffordtorusflow-git-main-kristins-projects-24a742b...
19.
I Used AI to Prove the Riemann Hypothesis. Roast Me Like You Roasted Budden(academia.edu)
4 points by kristintynski 9mo ago|3 comments
20.
by kristintynski 9mo ago
Interactive Simulation: https://cliffordtorusflow-git-main-kristins-projects-24a742b... Github repo with code/tests: https://github.com/ktynski/riemann-hypothesis-toroidal-proof After watching Budden g
21.
by kristintynski 10mo ago
Claims to have built a theory of everything (Standard Model + General Relativity) from a single, simple principle. But here's the kicker: the theory has zero free parameters? Instead of just accepting constants like the speed of light
22.
by kristintynski 11mo ago
Repo: https://github.com/ktynski/SimpleUniverse These are not fits. These are pure derivations from φ — the golden ratio: 1. Muon/electron mass ratio • Observed: 206.768 • Derived: φ⁴ = 206.765 (0.0013% error) 2
23.
Standard Model and General Relativity Derived from Mathematical Self-Consistency(academia.edu)
2 points by kristintynski 11mo ago|4 comments
24.
by kristintynski 11mo ago
Ten predictions. Zero free parameters. One irrational constant. --- ## The Shocking List These are not fits. These are pure derivations from φ — the golden ratio: 1. *Muon/electron mass ratio* • Observed: 206.768 • Derived:
25.
by kristintynski 11mo ago
Started with a simple question: why do particle mass ratios follow Fibonacci patterns? I found this: m_mu / m_e = 206.768... phi^4 = 206.765... m_tau / m_mu = 16.817... phi^3 = 16.817... alpha^(-1)(M_Z) = 127.955...
26.
by kristintynski 11mo ago
Interactive demo: https://fractal-recursive-coherence.vercel.app/ Every fundamental constant—α, G, ℏ, φ, all 25 Standard Model parameters—derived from ONE topological rule. Zero free parameters. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
27.
Show HN: AI made me this jewel and all I got was AI psychosis(fractal-recursive-coherence.vercel.app)
1 points by kristintynski 1y ago|0 comments
28.
There's no way this is right? Right?(github.com)
3 points by kristintynski 1y ago|0 comments
29.
What if the universe runs on recursion, not particles? A new formalism(ktynski.github.io)
2 points by kristintynski 1y ago|2 comments
30.
by kristintynski 1y ago
Background: I built a new theory of everything with GPT-4o in 6 weeks. No curve fitting. 19 physical constants derived from recursion and topology. It’s called FIRM — and it might be real. or, im just another crackpot. But im a crackpot wit

More ›