krig

10 ms·

1.
by krig 3mo ago
[flagged]
2.
by krig 4mo ago
--dangerously-skip-reading-the-article
3.
by krig 6mo ago
There are binaries for Mac here: https://codeberg.org/GramEditor/gram/releases/tag/1.0.0 The binary release for Linux is a bit rough, there's an `install.sh` script in the repo which can install the
4.
by krig 8mo ago
Those images are generated from a training set, and it is already well known and reported that those training sets contain _real_ CSAM, real violence, real abuse. That "generated" face of a child is based on real images of real ch
5.
by krig 10mo ago
I just reported the bug, it was the bot that was proudly mentioned in the announcement which created the PR and the code...
6.
by krig 10mo ago
Right, this is accurate. Except I thought taylordotfish worked for bun, so I guess no one at bun has looked at it at all then.
7.
by krig 10mo ago
> Bun, Zig, and uWebsockets are passion projects run by individuals with deep systems programming expertise. furthest thing from vibe coding imaginable. Sure, I definitely will not throw projects like Zig into that bucket, and I don&#x27
8.
by krig 10mo ago
> Prior to Bun, there was little focus on performance. This is just completely insane. We went through more than a decade of performance competition in the JS VM space, and the _only_ justification that Google had for creating V8 was per
9.
by krig 10mo ago
This announcement made me check in on the arbitrary code execution bug I reported that the Bun Claude bot created a PR for about 3 weeks ago: https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/24578 So far, someone from the
10.
by krig 1y ago
I’ll remove even more and _still_ call it a lisp and there is nothing you can do to stop me. Any memory management solution will run out of space and terminate unless there is literally infinite memory available. But I guess hash tables is
11.
by krig 1y ago
What in the world... jibal was the one who called _me_ a troll, I never called anyone a troll. Lord knows what is happening in this comment section at this point.
12.
by krig 1y ago
I can't reply to the reply to this one (guess the thread is getting too deep), but I just wanted to clarify that I'm not a rust critic, I use rust, I like rust, I have no problem with rust. OK great, moving on...
13.
by krig 1y ago
I used the word "childish" to describe posting comments about someones personality without any references or examples, and here you are doing the same but adding Gemini to the mix... and I'm the troll? :)
14.
by krig 1y ago
Is that really the whole reason for this grudge? He gave you a bunch of comments to work from! I was expecting a lot less from your description. I don't find it too hard to figure out what he meant - he doesn't want to you change
15.
by krig 1y ago
I'm offended by the Gemini slop!
16.
by krig 1y ago
That's the nice thing about a little side project, I can just have fun and noodle away at it without worrying about safety or comments ;)
17.
by krig 1y ago
Dude, I find it utterly offensive that you and the other guy keep referring to all these interactions with Bill where he was a mean boy, and yet the closest to an actual quote or reference is some Gemini slop? If you're going to be tha
18.
by krig 1y ago
First, no it isn't. What baseless accusation did I make? I haven't seen the conversations he is referring to, he didn't link to or quote anything. It's just some general complaint about Bill, which may be true but who ca
19.
by krig 1y ago
I don't really get the distinction between adding the dynamic-literals feature flag and using unsafe in Rust? Like, if he had called it #+unsafe dynamic-literals, would that have been better?
20.
by krig 1y ago
Well, first of all, I guess I am wrong! Hey, I'm not Bill, just a user of the language. A couple of clarifications, though: I did mean unsafe rust, not the safe subset. No need to get rude! Second of all, I am of course not under the i
21.
by krig 1y ago
I'm not the one throwing baseless accusations around. "He was mean to me once" isn't that interesting, especially without anything concrete to back it up.
22.
by krig 1y ago
Well, the statement is circular, colloquial speech doesn't have to be coherent. It's my understanding of what people generally mean when they complain about UB in the C standard, and it seems to be what gingerbill means too. My ta
23.
by krig 1y ago
This is super cool! I could imagine writing a very basic forth or lisp compiler in assembler, but even that would be quite the project.
24.
by krig 1y ago
Some day I might write a walkthrough of it, but it’s just a toy really.
25.
by krig 1y ago
I don’t think he works for me. I am not paying him. To the contrary, if anything _I_ am in debt since I am using all this code that he put out there for free. I guess there are a few things I could do in that situation. Move on to something
26.
by krig 1y ago
Well, sure. If that’s what you mean by having UB then it’s trivially true for any language with a C FFI for example, or rust with unsafe. I guess what I consider UB is when the compiler exploits UB for optimizations, like discarding code th
27.
by krig 1y ago
> Me too. I am just not going to contribute. No big deal. Makes sense! Plenty of other languages and projects out there.
28.
by krig 1y ago
Sorry to hear that! I haven’t had any such experience, quite the opposite. But I’m also an old. If someone tells me my code is shit, 1) they are probably right, and 2) I don’t really care. I can probably look at their code and find flaws in
29.
by krig 1y ago
Well, without concrete examples this just sounds childish TBH. But I haven’t looked very closely at it myself, hence the afaik qualifier.
30.
by krig 1y ago
First off, you wouldn’t write an actual interpreter for lisp like this if you wanted to use it for anything serious, it’s very slow. The parser is very simple thanks to the s-expressions, and the only builtin special forms really needed are

More ›