krferriter

7 ms·

1.
by krferriter 26d ago
I don’t agree. On an encrypted volume all space unallocated by the filesystem should have random data in it and should be indistinguishable from the portion representing in-use filesystem data. Deleting data securely involves overwriting al
2.
by krferriter 26d ago
Action vs inaction seems like an important distinction.
3.
by krferriter 1mo ago
Chrome password manager and Apple Passwords count, in this context.
4.
by krferriter 2mo ago
A random website breach can't disclose your password either, assuming you use random high-entropy passwords and the website only stores a hash of it. I haven't really seen the benefit to passkeys over passwords. Pretty much everyo
5.
by krferriter 2mo ago
If the fees are raised, individuals will be less willing to pay out of their own pocket. Even if they aren't raised people are less willing to pay out of pocket compared to an NGO or journalism org that had revenue and budget allotment
6.
by krferriter 3mo ago
> Every law should have The problem is that there isn't really this clean discrete sense of 'a law'. There is the federal code, and the federal register, and bills or rules enacted over time which amend those things. Often
7.
by krferriter 3mo ago
Mount a shared drive? Use sshfs?
8.
by krferriter 3mo ago
That's just federal permission saying they're allowed to even proceed with the process. Nuclear projects cannot begin at all unless they get federal permission. Now that they have permission to do a project related to nuclear ener
9.
by krferriter 4mo ago
> What's stopping you? Based on their comment I guess they are worried they won't earn enough stars on github
10.
by krferriter 4mo ago
> It has gotten to a point that all code I generate with Opus or Codex if there as iterator or reference in the argument, I start a fresh context, with a sort of `remove unnecessary clones, collections, and copies from the following code
11.
by krferriter 4mo ago
Convenient and good infrared video for all these scenarios is hard to come by but would be useful. I think if the DoD was willing to put some money into the budget for practical recreations of UAP scenarios that they then make public, they
12.
by krferriter 4mo ago
It was just a joke. You linked a thread about one particular camera artifact but missed the fact that there was another thread about this specific case. I've read all of those threads. There's not really much ambiguity here regard
13.
by krferriter 4mo ago
You are not getting the point here. Cases get talked about as UAP cases merely because they were initially catalogued as unidentified and have not yet had a conclusive resolution attached to them. It doesn't mean they are not resolvabl
14.
by krferriter 4mo ago
You are vastly overestimating how much analytical work gets put into investigating the original context and flight modeling for videos like these before they are released. The UAP Task Force did a presentation to Congress in which the head
15.
by krferriter 4mo ago
Don’t cite the deep lore to me https://www.metabunk.org/threads/the-chandelier-ufo.13307/
16.
by krferriter 4mo ago
This is not about “the US military cannot identify”. These case reports happen often because one person filmed something and perhaps that one person didn’t know what it was. The video then gets saved and catalogued as unidentified. The vide
17.
by krferriter 4mo ago
Birds tend to be well insulated so when they fly at altitude in cold weather they don’t lose all their body heat. The color it appears on infrared footage depends on the other pixels in frame. It uses dynamic ranges to map infrared values t
18.
by krferriter 4mo ago
I think it is very likely a parachute. It moves in a swinging relation to the heat source because the heat source is hanging from it. It doesn’t exhibit reflection across the center of frame like you’d expect from a lens flare, and you can
19.
by krferriter 4mo ago
Luna also represents the House district in Florida that is home to the Church of Scientology Flag Service Org headquarters.
20.
by krferriter 4mo ago
That's interesting but that's not what this video is. The star shape in the DoD video is a camera artifact. Just a really bright source of infrared light.
21.
by krferriter 4mo ago
I'll add that I had the impression that the star-shaped one resembles a distant missile but could even be something even less interesting than a missile, given that at a few points later in the video, a parachute is visible and the he
22.
by krferriter 4mo ago
What do you mean by "encounter lasted maybe 5 minutes"? Where did the lights go after the 5 minutes? From your description these could potentially be military grade illumination flares, which fall very slowly and can burn for seve
23.
by krferriter 4mo ago
> - there exist technologies on our planet that human engineers and physicists do not know the underlying principles of their operation > - there exist unknown physical principles and forces that a party other than the USG has harness
24.
by krferriter 4mo ago
I agree, it needs to be more specific. Like: "NASA, ESA, and Roscosmos all confirm definitive concrete proof, and publish this proof, for the presence of organisms, or technology created by organisms, which originated from outside Eart
25.
by krferriter 4mo ago
Several of these look like balloons and birds. Two of them have already leaked before. Both of those are missiles being viewed with an infrared camera. One of them shows a missile passing through the field of view rapidly with a motion blur
26.
by krferriter 5mo ago
When you're at a base it will tell you the directions and distances to other nearby bases. You can pick which you want to go to, remember what direction it is in, and then fly in that direction until it comes up on the minimap. It will
27.
by krferriter 6mo ago
No. This war has been illegal from day one. The 60 window without prior authorization only applies if the US is attacked. The US was not attacked.
28.
by krferriter 6mo ago
I've never had ads in my Youtube Premium
29.
by krferriter 6mo ago
AP Style is simply wrong on this, then.
30.
by krferriter 6mo ago
Yeah despite being heavier I find the Airpods Max more comfortable to wear than my Sonys. Sony has shockingly shallow ear cups and do get much warmer and the headband is very narrow and barely padded. The Airpods Max ear cups are better and

More ›