kosh2

8 ms·

1.
by kosh2 4d ago
> we are to cementing a dangerous precedent where operators of AIs cannot be blamed. What we should be much more concerned is an existential threat to humanity not if anybody can be blamed.
2.
by kosh2 11d ago
I'm kind of baffled that people talk mostly about technical details when this is another big scream that says: "We are losing control of AI models". And the smarter they get, the worse it will be. Maybe next time they find a
3.
by kosh2 2mo ago
That is why I always say: Don't donate to wikipedia, donate to archive.org
4.
by kosh2 2mo ago
Are people still getting infected? Yes? Then it is not a solved problem.
5.
by kosh2 3mo ago
Way before that it will become political. Regulation is the only true threat left anyways.
6.
by kosh2 5mo ago
Windows terminal
7.
by kosh2 7mo ago
This is like saying quantum mechanics is really simple to understand, all you have to do is find the right formula and plug in the numbers. When people talk about understanding, they mean as knowing how the underlying mechanism works often
8.
by kosh2 1y ago
> There is no separation of code and data on the wire - everything is a stream of bytes. There isn't one in electronics either - everything is signals going down the wires. Would two wires actually solve anything or do you run into
9.
by kosh2 1y ago
As long as LLMs have no true memory, this is expected. Think about the movie Memento. That is the experience for an LLM. What could any human do with a context window of 10 minutes and no other memory? You could write yourself notes… but yo
10.
by kosh2 1y ago
Black holes have the same mass and information as the stars that formed them. Unless the theory also breaks mass and information conservation, the star that gave birth to our black hole must have been as massive as our entire universe. I do
11.
by kosh2 1y ago
I have two problems / questions with this: 1. This theory requires a parent universe that can't have been formed inside a black hole. This means there must a be second "universe creation" mechanism that we can / may
12.
The Chinese Hamster Revolutionized Medicine(youtu.be)
2 points by kosh2 1y ago|0 comments
13.
by kosh2 1y ago
How much energy does it cost for a human to generate an image?
14.
by kosh2 2y ago
I agree with many posters in here, that the cause will likely be bad data one way or another. Maybe we need to take a step back and only use data, that are almost 100% accurate. Like the time of death after the data was collected. If a mode
15.
by kosh2 2y ago
> because others know that you have it. Except that cyber weapons like these are 1. One time use 2. Expire upon detection (mostly) I think this is simply just a tool for offensive action only.
16.
by kosh2 3y ago
This is not something that is only a thing within google. Similar things are happening in a lot of companies and even public institutions like schools, universities and public media networks like the BBC. It's Doctor who traveling to m
17.
by kosh2 3y ago
That is not my point. Even if we had a model that could portray reality as objective as possible, a lot of people wouldn't like that and be actually offended by it. This has also been going on a lot in the "representation"
18.
by kosh2 3y ago
Why would it accept black then?
19.
by kosh2 3y ago
If you look at attempts to actively rewrite history, they have to because a hypothetical model trained only on facts would produce results that they won't like
20.
by kosh2 3y ago
The geofencing part was a bit insane. All plausible deniability goes out of the window right there.
21.
by kosh2 3y ago
Maybe simply a larger task? "Write 10 popular mini games" --> What are those games? 1. Agent --> How does each of them work? 2. Agent --> Write each of those. Agent 3-13
22.
by kosh2 3y ago
It happens but it is rare. Given the COVID outbreak, it is definitely circumstancial evidence.
23.
by kosh2 3y ago
Agreed. It would be great if it could ask questions about missing context but maybe language models are bad for that task. Maybe one needs a second run, evaluate the answer and then make it look for info that could improve the answer.
24.
by kosh2 4y ago
Self-driving cars are much more difficult than one might think because the AI has to interface with the real world, something that humans have evolved for over millions of years. Like others have said, worry more about every job that primar
25.
by kosh2 4y ago
Well, there's one thing that humans are much better than robots for the forseeable future: Energy efficiency. Try building a robot that contains a general purpose AI and the motoric functions and sense as humans that runs on the energy
26.
by kosh2 4y ago
It is true but then again, we constantly ajust the trust in sources based on what works and what doesn't. If I watch a youtube tutorial teaching me how to bake pizza and it comes out totally wrong and a watch another that produces exel
27.
by kosh2 4y ago
I'm constantly amazed that most discussions on technical forums center around what ChatGPT can't do and why it can't replace X and how often it produced nonsense. Yes, it's true. But then again, if it didn't make mi
28.
by kosh2 4y ago
I switched over a few years ago as well but for some reason forgot to delete my old account. Sigh :( I never reuse passwords of course but it's still annoying having to go through everything and change a whole bunch of passwords.
29.
by kosh2 4y ago
Seems to me that this could happen just as well with allowlist and blocklist
30.
by kosh2 4y ago
The only thing that can maybe be understandable for us is an infinite universe. What was before 0? -1. What before that? -2. But how can we ever understand how out of a state of nothingness came something? That is where the science "en

More ›