Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kodefant
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Happy to report back that both the Github scope and MFA has been resolved :)
2.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Just to be clear: I don't charge for this feature. It's a free offering in Shipnix for everyone who is registered, and then you are free to create servers with this image through the DigitalOcean dashboard if that's what you
3.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Fixed! It should only ask for publicly available data now
4.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Working on fixing this as we speak. Creating two flows so users can fine-grain these permissions in the dashboard. Will ship it in an hour or two
5.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! My thoughts about the hobby plan is really just an entry level tier for those who are not ready yet to invest in the unlimited plans. If no one wants the plan, I can adjust or remove it, no harm in testing the waters. The target audienc
6.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! Shipnix does not provide the hardware itself, but uses a third-party server provider like DigitalOcean. So the server costs are extra. Thanks for the feedback. I meant to add a line on the pricing page to clarify this, but it slipped. W
7.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
That's weird! Seems to work here. Will add it to UptimeRobot to monitor. Thanks for letting me know!
8.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! This is just my very biased opinion, but in very short terms: It's quicker, less work and you get servers running on a Nix flakes server config from the start with everything working just by filling out a form. Especially in the fr
9.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! Thanks :) Yes, it requires a Nix flake with NixOS configuration to run the server itself, but the Barebones starter configuration is very minimal. If I understand you correctly, I think the "Migration" starter should work with
10.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! MFA is top priority to implement next. I won't remove the "beta" flag on my service before this is implemented. I also think it makes sense to have it enforced. Yes, agreed about the Github scope, and I already had anothe
11.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Yes! I look very much forward to experimenting with implementing Devenv on some upcoming starters :)
12.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! I think it solves many of the same problems, just differently. I would think it's more of a beginner-friendly choice for those who are new to NixOS and find NixOps a bit difficult to learn. Select a starter, have it all deployed an
13.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! The main strengths of Shipnix right now is ease of provisoning and deployment. And I will continue to add convenient starters that gives you a readily bootstrapped server in several technologies. Most of what you would need to do is eit
14.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Yes, I have plans on adding more providers in the future. I am especially interested in priotitizing a provider with GPU instances like Vultr. AWS/Google are also on the agenda.
15.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
BTW, I just published the "Migration" starter a couple of seconds ago. It's meant to help you with loading your current project that will be compliant with Shipnix. The documentation is slightly outdated, but it's mainly
16.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi! I am the creator of Shipnix and just saw this post on the front page :) Hope you find it interesting! I'm reading comments coming in and will try to answer your questions as best I can!
17.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
Hi :) This should be possible, but I have not done it yet myself. For the time being, you would have to create a barebones NixOS project and build on that based on own research. I have plans for making a dedicated starter to provision Elixi
18.
▲
by
kodefant
4y ago
I am a paying IHP user, working on it commercially, and I for one support the paid plan. If I used it for pure hobby, the paid version features wouldn't really matter that much to me anyway, but professionally these are timesavers. I a
19.
▲
by
kodefant
5y ago
Personally I am using DataSync like described in the docs, but with Elm, so React is just an option for using this API, not a requirement :)
20.
▲
by
kodefant
5y ago
To me, IHP provides so many great features for making type-safe robust web apps, I have forgotten about GraphQL.
21.
▲
by
kodefant
6y ago
About Haskell missing pragmatism, ever tried IHP? I don't think the development environment sucks, but you are free to disagree. In my opinion, the developer experience is ultraslick, it's easy for beginners to get started with an
22.
▲
by
kodefant
6y ago
I have been learning Haskell through IHP. It's the best and actually simplest web framework I have ever tried. The developer experience is the best I ever had for a MVC-style framework. And I got to learn Haskell without banging my hea