kmijyiyxfbklao

5 ms·

1.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 24d ago
What if you discover that you are exceptionally ugly?
2.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 24d ago
I'm pretty sure if we had sex in public we would feel less weird about sex too. But I wouldn't advocate about that.
3.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 1mo ago
You are supposed to fixed the same way the first world countries fixed it, by staying there are improving things with the other people that want to improve things. Oh wait they all left for other countries, oops I guess people that couldn&#
4.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 2mo ago
If every human in the world offloaded life decisions to the current AI models, we would live in a better world by the commonly used metrics (less crime, better life expectancy, people doing better financially)
5.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 3mo ago
How was it disproven by the New World? The countries that mixed (Latin America) are weaker than the country that didn't (USA)
6.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 3mo ago
How is 1500 years ago a short time frame? Yeah, people moved, but how many people in what amount of time is important. And places become more boring if the have the same migrants as every other place, not less boring.
7.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 4mo ago
> I've done that evaluation with LLMs and they're definitely not conscious. This is an important point to just make it a side comment like that. Tell us how we can evaluate if something is conscious.
8.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 5mo ago
You can always trick investors. For example all the overpromising Musk has done over the years. Also when you are that famous you can sell lower quality goods for a higher price that people will buy because they are associated to you.
9.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 5mo ago
Twitter seems to be more popular in reddit too https://old.reddit.com/domain/threads.com/top/ https://old.reddit.com/domain/x.com/top/
10.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 5mo ago
But there is a distinction we can make between flowers and wasps. If there is no distinction we can make between Schwartz and non-Schwartz, then we are susceptible to the sample problem with or without AI. And if there is a distinction then
11.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 6mo ago
That's all good if you assume people can't be tricked (tricked into paying more, tricked into buying something they don't want, tricked into working harder). The tricked person ends up with less and Elon ends up with more.
12.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 6mo ago
Well if that gets us LinkedIn, we should move as far away from that as possible, and not listen to the people who want real names everywhere.
13.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 6mo ago
No, it's important. People are allowed to discourage each other from buying a product that they consider subpar.
14.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 6mo ago
Not conservative (there's nothing traditional about this) or liberal, just surveillance authoritarianism.
15.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 6mo ago
Planning includes the prototype you build with AI.
16.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
This is as useful as doing physics with spherical cows.
17.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
The whole point is that mandating websites to require age verification is more authoritarian than people are pretending it is.
18.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
>Or if they're still a kid, they can have their privileges temporarily revoked. Since people are already talking about using the law instead of parenting this needs clarification. Are the parents the one that would revoke their priv
19.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
It's purposefully undefined because it's a social concept, not an engineering one. And it's also subjective. You can tell because they use OpenClaw as an example of a tasteful project. I would put OpenClaw in the same categor
20.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
I don't think it counts as counter-signaling if can call him out.
21.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
> 4. Myth: Immigrants will replace the population. > Reality: Newcomers quickly adopt the habits of their new country. Within one generation, immigrant birth rates drop to match everyone else’s. That doesn't address the "myt
22.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 7mo ago
Good. Being OK with authoritarianism because they are on your side is never good.
23.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 8mo ago
I'm OK with you re-editing the movie as you watch it, but you can't say you watched the same movie as other people that don't do that.
24.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 8mo ago
Yeah, I think that's why I don't find this superinteresting. It's more a viral social media thing, than an AI thing.
25.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 8mo ago
Since there are no humans involved, it's more like growing a tree. Sure it's good to know how trees grow, but not knowing about cells didn't stop thousands of years of agriculture.
26.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 9mo ago
If it's "Who is worse Google or LLMs?", I think I'll say Google is worse. The biggest issue I see with LLMs is needing to pay a subscription to tech companies to be able to use them.
27.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 9mo ago
Abandoning your children is not an extreme example. It's a situation that anyone that knows poverty is familiar with.
28.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 10mo ago
>They don't know I know, and they don't know that I think less of them, and I always will. lol, behavior like this is way more destructive to personal relationships than AI ever will be.
29.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 10mo ago
I think it's more comforting to think that you could've done nothing about your life being bad. It's so obvious that you need both good luck and hard work.
30.
by kmijyiyxfbklao 10mo ago
Then why not say "they are just computer programs"? I think the reason people don't say that is because they want to say "I already understand what they are, and I'm not impressed and it's nothing new". Bu

More ›