klysm

5 ms·

1.
by klysm 14d ago
Run more agents!
2.
by klysm 24d ago
This sounds like a proper of the parser, rather than of the language
3.
by klysm 1mo ago
It isn’t, but the whole night thing is a bit of a problem and storage isn’t there yet at grid scale, but it’s coming.
4.
by klysm 1mo ago
Thankfully this is one of the easiest limitations to get around technically. Grid forming inverters and inertia markets make this pretty straightforward to solve IMO. Storage is the key thing we need to solve
5.
by klysm 2mo ago
Nothing competes with JLC but circuit hub isn’t terrible
6.
by klysm 2mo ago
This and sheet metal manufacturing from Oshcut have been game changers for me
7.
by klysm 2mo ago
Not true, you can make the R G and B points far enough out to capture the entire human gamut
8.
by klysm 2mo ago
Maybe they wired up a agent to file lawsuits
9.
by klysm 2mo ago
I always leave a 0 ohm DNP on any TX/RX line.
10.
by klysm 2mo ago
I’ve been working with MIP solvers a lot at work recently, and the depth of black magic is so deep it’s hard to comprehend. Even after the presolve there are so many tradeoffs and structures to exploit it’s hard to understand the whole syst
11.
by klysm 2mo ago
I’ll believe this when I see it on GitHub - rooting for them
12.
by klysm 3mo ago
I agree with your premise, but I think it’s also important to reconcile this with the idea that nothing is simple. Everything that’s made is usually much more complex than it appears in the surface
13.
by klysm 3mo ago
I just use Debian these days
14.
by klysm 3mo ago
ERCOT operates under a “connect and manage” interconnection philosophy. This means things can actually get built quickly (unlike other ISOs), but some management is required. Of course, there are some downsides to this approach, but overall
15.
by klysm 3mo ago
Indexes?
16.
by klysm 5mo ago
What kind of throughput are we talking about?
17.
by klysm 6mo ago
Maybe the technical requirements at the time were a good excuse but as soon as you demonstrate the market will tolerate that why on earth would you remove it?
18.
by klysm 6mo ago
Damnit I was really rooting for uv :(
19.
by klysm 6mo ago
I hate everything about XML. I have lost weeks of my life to fixing whitespace sensitive bugs
20.
by klysm 6mo ago
Yes but think of the shareholders! And that doesn’t show up nicely on a spreadsheet does it?
21.
by klysm 6mo ago
Bravo to the designers of this library. It’s well implemented and I’ve been using the poly fill for years now
22.
by klysm 7mo ago
I’m not seeing HVDC tech on the interconnection queue. The baseline power problem isn’t going away any time soon. Nuclear just doesn’t go on standby, that’s the point.
23.
by klysm 7mo ago
Grids need reliability. Battery tech is not close to providing long enough durations to fulfill load with just renewables. I would much rather have nukes than natural gas filling that role.
24.
by klysm 7mo ago
I expect this kind of counter signaling to become more common in the coming years.
25.
by klysm 7mo ago
Little too lexically close to girth
26.
by klysm 7mo ago
Seems like a good way to materialize the conflict.
27.
by klysm 7mo ago
Quick submit a level 10 CVE DOS vuln!
28.
by klysm 7mo ago
What does a mesh network have to do with this?
29.
by klysm 7mo ago
Idk if this perspective is naive, but complex numbers to me are most motivated by spinning things.
30.
by klysm 7mo ago
They will also be reading all of the slop generated by the current and previous generations of LLMs

More ›