kloop

5 ms·

1.
by kloop 7d ago
Which makes sense. In a conversation about code, the most likely answer is often some comment about backwards compatibility. In a conversation about a legacy enterprise app, the most likely answer is often going completely insane
2.
by kloop 7d ago
I still think this is because, on a new release, it works on some prompts the previous ones did badly at, because new weights do well on a different set of prompts. Then after a few days you notice the prompts that it does badly on that the
3.
by kloop 18d ago
I'd put Kevlin Henney up there with him. His talk on 1968 alone is pretty amazing
4.
by kloop 27d ago
Sure, but the new patterns are several years old at this point. Not adapting is a choice
5.
by kloop 1mo ago
So that you can name a section of code without polluting the namespace.
6.
by kloop 1mo ago
It's training data might have a ton of examples of people hurrying and screwing more after being yelled at
7.
by kloop 2mo ago
Yeah, but that capture is usually just hosted spark usage. The AI usage has mostly been getting it to explain error messages
8.
by kloop 2mo ago
> “The source described leading AI labs or their allies approaching the administration every 3-5 months with an idea to ban open-source models.” That's going to hit first amendment grounds pretty quick, the same way that software in
9.
by kloop 2mo ago
It does make it correct in the reality sense If someone says something happens and the code says something else, the code wins.
10.
by kloop 2mo ago
The article mentions that the "pranksterish" groups who took psychedelics weathered it just fine. They didn't have an expectation to disappoint. Irreverence seems to be just as good It does sound like the opposite a bit, it s
11.
by kloop 2mo ago
Give how default gcc and clang are, along with the recommendation to update the standard instead of gcc and clang, it sounds like the standard is noncompliant with standard C++ Standard in the sense of commonly used or supplied
12.
by kloop 2mo ago
whistles 3.3 kilopounds? That's a lot
13.
by kloop 3mo ago
Generally speaking, things that you sell (the legal term is commercial speech, iirc) is more able to be regulated by the government. The government can ban the sale of those things to minors, generally. So the category of porn sites that re
14.
by kloop 3mo ago
It would probably also be illegal for the government to mandate a paywall. The issue is not that age gates are illegal, but that the government forcing people to use age gates is illegal.
15.
by kloop 3mo ago
There's a big difference here, in the US anyways, neither alcohol nor nicotine have first amendment protections. Basically all content delivered over the US does. That's a much thornier legal issue
16.
by kloop 3mo ago
> It is not disingenuous, maybe a little loose on the 'meaning', but your definition is rather narrow The thing is that every other country does have what they're describing. > The Color Purple has been challenged many
17.
by kloop 3mo ago
Ahh, more supplement. I must have misread as more absolute amount
18.
by kloop 3mo ago
Do they need more vitamin D? I thought they just needed more sun to get the same vitamin D
19.
by kloop 3mo ago
You're not wrong that a rationale is required. But the master knowing when to break the rules because of tacit knowledge without being able to explain it is a real effect
20.
by kloop 4mo ago
> Radioactive decay shows that a young earth could not exist This is one of the worst arguments against young earth creationism. You have to posit a being who can create the universe, but can't create already decayed elements.
21.
by kloop 4mo ago
> The problem we're seeing across many professions is AI output is not getting vetted by knowledgeable people The problem is that output sometimes take longer to verify than to create in the first place. That turns AI into a deeply
22.
by kloop 4mo ago
1st amendment. There's a long history of carve outs around commercial products. But, if Linux devs (who aren't selling anything) went to the mat against this law, the government of California would lose and (at least part of) thei
23.
by kloop 4mo ago
> The article mentions Zig as a factor, but is micromanaging memory really gaining over 2x vs node? As someone who has optimized by reducing/batching heap allocations, 2x seems within the realm of possibility, depending on the exact
24.
by kloop 4mo ago
> There's not really enough info to know if this is just a coin toss or something more. The difference is always having one or two devs who care. Every successful software project I've ever seen has had a few devs who care way
25.
by kloop 4mo ago
> It can't block a federal warrant. Exactly. If they all submit to federal warrants, and the state has a law effectively against that, then it becomes illegal to use the cameras.
26.
by kloop 4mo ago
That probably just means it's illegal for local governments to use cloud based cameras in Illinois
27.
by kloop 5mo ago
That doesn't seem like the obvious story to me. Normies and even most (non-tech) companies don't really know the difference between chatgpt and claude yet. And they generally don't have opinions or ideas on agentic X. The obv
28.
by kloop 5mo ago
> No more: five code monkey contractors under a lead. Two top-notch devs are all that is needed now, unrestrained by sprints and mindless ceremonies. This doesn't tell me anything. Two devs who cared and didn't have a bunch of
29.
by kloop 5mo ago
To be blunt, those freelancers wouldn't be doing this if they had better options Every time one of these articles come up, you can recognize that silicon valley is treating these people badly, but you should remember that everyone else
30.
by kloop 5mo ago
No, this paper doesn't seem to talk about regional differences. The implication seems to be that it wouldn't be surprising to find differences between groups that separated more than 2kya, as there was active changes going on befo

More ›