klokoman

5 ms·

1.
by klokoman 8y ago
Because there aren't avatars and signatures. Those are essential to recognize users and also find out what they're about (signatures with links to other sites helped everyone). Also even a little personalization will be an incenti
2.
by klokoman 8y ago
Don't worry, if you read the article well and then read her other article you'll see what kind of person she is and why she comes up with that conclusion. You are probably wise enough to know when it's socially appropriate to
3.
by klokoman 8y ago
Good job, more space for people who don't care about the planet or anything outside their tribe
4.
by klokoman 8y ago
What if it succeeds for the wrong people?
5.
by klokoman 8y ago
Voting is not speech. Also it's what you aren't allowed to say that changed.
6.
by klokoman 8y ago
Take a look at anarcho-capitalism and Murray Rothbard. You can find many works of his on mises.org
7.
by klokoman 9y ago
It happens in all societies where people are forced to conform and markets are closed to people without a license. Japan is economically the mono-ethnic version of what US/EU are moving towards: a society where you must fill in the box
8.
by klokoman 9y ago
Some things shouldn't even be proposed. If someone proposed to kill old people, he would be fired or even arrested. Same thing should happen here. But no, idiots and evil people can propose all kinds of evil stuff over and over and ove
9.
by klokoman 9y ago
I am from the EU and I appreciate you
10.
by klokoman 9y ago
I wonder if he teaches word because it's mandatory or if it's a choice. Because if this people live in a village without electricity and computers, maybe there are better skills they can learn before microsoft word.
11.
by klokoman 9y ago
Not just business, even information websites are affected. This is the most vicious attack against freedom of speech the EU ever pulled off.
12.
by klokoman 9y ago
Nobody believes the legislators have ill intent. Then they find themselves ruined but waking up then is hard too.
13.
by klokoman 9y ago
Unable to direct attack freedom of expression, the spread of informations and small business, the EU developed another bureacratic layer on top all the bureaucratic layers already in effect. This layer is pretty hard to comply with, and req
14.
by klokoman 9y ago
I'm gonna go full populist here and say that instead of making AI really smart so that they can read a contract, we should make AI as smart as an average human and discard the contracts it can't understand.
15.
by klokoman 9y ago
Yes, in fact I was talking about crony-capitalism. Also consider the fact that Italy is the country where a communist party got the largest share of the popular vote, ever. But fun thing is that after ww2 many communists in Italy didn'
16.
by klokoman 9y ago
Taxes and bureaucracy and crony capitalism are really high. The State and political parties also have a great propaganda machine in place and blame everything on tax evasion (it starts in school with specially designed cartoons [1]. Truth i
17.
by klokoman 9y ago
In some cases you can assign the object you want to copy as the [[prototype]] of another object, this way you delegate what you don't want to change and change what you want in the "copy" via assignments
18.
by klokoman 9y ago
This looks more like the old dance that has always been done in all industries. Rich and influencing people saying "we need to regulate the giants", so the legislators regulate the market and the giants don't have to face com
19.
by klokoman 9y ago
Yeah, this "alarms" are just a way to call for regulations that will in practice pull up the ladder so other companies will never be able to climb where fb or google stand now. This has always happened in all industries: some comp
20.
by klokoman 9y ago
This looks fun, good job
21.
by klokoman 9y ago
Honestly when I see other libertarians speaking against net neutrality I suffer a lot. Good to see at least there is one other that understands the pro-nn arguments
22.
by klokoman 9y ago
Putting in jail legislators who make evil laws should be a good starting point. What's evil will be defined later. The point is that there must be a serious incentive in thinking before making laws, this stuff affects everyone, if you
23.
by klokoman 9y ago
Because it is one of the few sectors where you can be a little creative and not obey the rules set by corrupted bureaucrats decades ago
24.
by klokoman 9y ago
Wikipedia is extremely biased and, more important, it is not the internet. If you teach people that internet is cable tv 2.0 very bad things will happen.
25.
by klokoman 9y ago
Proof EU isn't needed, free market will fix everything
26.
by klokoman 9y ago
This is how most of uni lectures are. The only interaction you get is badly answered questions that would not have been asked if it was to possible to pause or rewind the lecture.
27.
by klokoman 9y ago
Politicians keep saying things like "China is the future", young people hate free speech, so there are no reasons to hope.
28.
by klokoman 9y ago
But that's all the fun