kkapelon

9 ms·

1.
by kkapelon 7d ago
Either testing for something bigger OR demonstrating their power to a 3rd party with minimal real disruption
2.
by kkapelon 8d ago
I am also using termux and moshi and at least with moshi everything works out of the box. Where does it get clunky? What functionality is missing?
3.
by kkapelon 8d ago
How many other products can you name that: 1) are terminal based (not gui apps that you need to install) 2) Can be run by mosh/ssh 3) Track agent sessions automatically 4) Have built-in git worktree management 5) Show agents connection
4.
by kkapelon 8d ago
> Their connectivity product is unique There is also netbird, netmaker, zerotier and several others.
5.
by kkapelon 8d ago
source?link?
6.
by kkapelon 20d ago
You are lucky that you got valid PRs that actually fix something. I got PRs that either never worked or even broke stuff https://blog.codepipes.com/llms/your-pr-was-rejected.html
7.
by kkapelon 1mo ago
Strictly from personal opinion 1) Built-in sub agents assume you use a single AI agent. Some people use multiple, so they need separate terminals/processes by definition. Even if you use the same agent sometimes you have different secu
8.
by kkapelon 1mo ago
Not sure I understand your question. You literally asked, "WHAT is it that makes herdr et al so popular"? Why? Because it has more/better features. Or you mean something else? Specifically against cmux, it is not Macosonly. S
9.
by kkapelon 1mo ago
Simplest setup would be just plain ssh/mosh. Nothing more exotic. I have seen moshi.app but haven't tested it yet.
10.
by kkapelon 1mo ago
https://herdr.dev/compare/
11.
by kkapelon 1mo ago
https://herdr.dev/compare/
12.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
I am not familiar with all the tools you listed so please correct me if i am wrong, but all these will catch stuff that LLMs can potentially catch as well (if configured correctly). They will not handle any architectural problems (i.e. this
13.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
> Once you do all that the PR process is pointless manual PR reviews can catch things that llms currently miss. Examples are duplicated code, lack of unit tests or introducing security issues. None of these really break the build. So jus
14.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
tmux and zellij are compared here https://herdr.dev/compare/
15.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
There is a whole page just on this subject https://herdr.dev/compare/
16.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
There is a whole page about this https://herdr.dev/compare/ For me the killer feature is the git worktree management. But in essence it is tmux on steroid (Specifically for agents)
17.
by kkapelon 2mo ago
You missed the most important one. Automatic git worktree management. So that different agents don't clash with each other.
18.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Because of lot of AI PRs come from first time contributors who just discovered the tools. Maybe their PR is amazing, maybe it is trash. You never know until you review it.
19.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
What exactly does rac validate do? How is it deterministic? Is there an example somewhere?
20.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
The goal posts keep moving. First iroh was marketed as "solves communication behind NAT". Then we went to application level NAT busting vs node level NAT busting. Then we went to distributed vs client-server, then we went to stabl
21.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
They don't need to be https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel For this simple scenario (just exposing your laptop to a public IP) there are already a gazillion alternatives (e.g. ngrok)
22.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
They do if you use tailscale and friends
23.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
but if I am shipping a video conferencing application (where I control both the client and the server) I don't need nat traversal anymore. My clients will have outgoing connections to whichever co-ordination server I choose. Tailscale
24.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
but what exactly is the use case? I was responding to the nat traversal topic.. If I wanted to share something internal with a friend I would use ngrok or any of the million alternatives. Anyway, this is exactly why my top-level comment say
25.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Like https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tsnet ?
26.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Congrats on shipping You need urgently a "versus" page that talks about tailscale/netbird/netmaker/zerotier/twingate/openziti Looking at the use cases, right now I don't see anything that cannot be do
27.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
you can embed tailscale on the application level https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tsnet
28.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
Already possible with taiscale, netmaker, zerotier etc. https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works
29.
by kkapelon 3mo ago
isn't this exactly what tailscale (and also zerotier, netmaker) do? https://tailscale.com/blog/how-nat-traversal-works
30.
by kkapelon 5mo ago
Thanks! I fixed it.

More ›