kjaftaedi

13 ms·

1.
by kjaftaedi 4y ago
I think you are confused. Sharing your salary is one thing. Saying that you are an employee at X company and make X dollars is giving away both your salary and corporate information. The key is not involving the company. Share your salary a
2.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
You're equating horrible experience with cross platform architectures, whereas there are any number of reasons apps can be bad. It is perfectly possible to build a poor app in any language.
3.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
All web servers respond to all hostnames. It is the default unless you have configured it otherwise. In the event you are doing virtual hosts in Apache, you just add a single line: ServerAlias www.example.com And your webserver will respon
4.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Your comments give me the impression this isn't totally clicking just yet. All that is necessary is to add an entry in your hosts file for hidusi[.]com that points to the IP of your existing server. That's it. Step completed. No l
5.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
This concept is not about explaining things in terms a 6 year old can understand. It's about understanding the subject matter well enough that if necessary you could simplify and elaborate on topics to bring your audience to your level
6.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Every system has a hosts file that you can edit for exactly this purpose. No need to set up DNS at all. Your system will resolve whatever hostnames you want to whatever IP addresses you want. You just add the entries to a text file. It will
7.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
They will have one soon, and they have a mobile browser already, which is my default.
8.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
We don't have bank account fees. Another fun fact: pretty much everyone here pays off their credit card every month. The bank will close your account if you do not. Of course there are exceptions, but this is the general rule. (if you
9.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
It's definitely not legal to employ you as an FTE Just like if someone from the US came to your country, your country will 100% prevent you from hiring them without significant life-changing effort. Hopefully your negotiation for addit
10.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
150% shameless cash grab and one of the largest wastes of community goodwill in some time. Honestly if it weren't for the shady actions you described, I maybe could have bit my tongue. But the wizard-of-oz game they are playing has bee
11.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Your analogy is slightly better, but even then it still misses the whole idea of hubs and connecting flights, because it's not just your trip to the beach, it's a whole network of cars trips to the beach that also depend on your t
12.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
These aren't items that are bought and sold. If you give up your slot, you can not buy it back at any price. Now your have to re-route your whole airline network. The value is in terms of not bankrupting your company.
13.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
> They have the option That option is to lose their slot, if they lose their slots, they will probably lose an entire hub on their network that they can not regain. It's not like you can just buy these slots back. In fact, slots
14.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
It's the law. Just Google 'use it or lose it slot rule' It was dropped in March 2020, but recently brought back since the committee thought the pandemic was 'over'. Here is an article I googled for you: https:&#x2F
15.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
This is not how it works at all. Slots are extremely valuable, they are highly regulated because they are in such demand. These aren't just things you take and leave at random.
16.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
You're making a strawman / false equivalence. They are forcing them to fly the planes. The company has already decided the value of the slots exceed the lost passenger revenue. The company could not fly the plane, but the govern
17.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
You're leaving out a lot of valuable information. Did you check your security log in github? Do you have MFA enabled on your account? Did you check your repository and account and make sure that all of the SSH keys saved are recognized
18.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Pretty much every computer magazine from the mid-late 80s onward had lewd software ads in the back. Alas, I was too young to cleverly find a way to purchase these without my parents finding out, and was never able to locate a BBS that hoste
19.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
They say they don't know why he would do this, and then quote someone else saying this information would be a huge advantage. They don't seem to elaborate what that advantage is.
20.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
When I was doing this, I would just use a tablet. Android, iPad, Windows, they all have monitor extending software and have for at least a decade now. Saves you the need to by a screen if you've already got a tablet lying around somewh
21.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Agreed, but with the target unwilling to contact even his family in 10 years, and being in a completely different country than the one looking for him .. these things make the wiretap theory a little watery as well. Your second theory would
22.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
I severely dislike Amazon and try to avoid supporting them, but, I do have the original echo with the video screen and it's better now than when I bought it. At some point they even added the ability to control my Phillips Hue lights,
23.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Finding this person at random in an area of 100s of millions of people, and recognizing him 10 years later from a photo where his face is totally blurred? I feel like there's another piece to this story that is being hidden. The Facebo
24.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
I got the information from the thread linked in the headline. (scroll to their follow up posts) I don't have Norton, so I am unable to test this myself.
25.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
> Also, it's not like they maliciously inserted this thing to mine crypto for Norton itself. No, but it is still malicious in the sense that it: (1) does not inform the user or ask for consent (2) seemingly does not offer an option
26.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Gotta wonder what Peter Norton thinks about still having his name on this.
27.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Agreed, but the line of thinking is to try and prosecute this. You'd have to prove to the court that theranos used their bad techniques instead of their good ones. I am not as optimistic they kept such detailed records of their crimes,
28.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
They had a fully functional lab though, it just wasn't using Theranos' devices. This is what they did to Wallgreens, they sold them on the idea that they would have theranos machines in-store, but instead what they did was do IV b
29.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
I don't feel that it's just Google trying to replicate this, but Microsoft and Apple as well.. Microsoft and Apple just have more legacy code to rewrite to reach this goal. I think the lesson has definitely been learned, some just
30.
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
How would that work. Whether you take money out of the market or make a sale of an NFT, both are taxed income, no?

More ›