Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kirurik
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
kirurik
8mo ago
You can run some models pretty decently using CPU inference only, things like Gemma 3 that are built for exactly that use case or some tiny speech to text models via llama.cpp that I have tested out (not so good). Although not the best for
2.
▲
by
kirurik
8mo ago
Thank you for replying to me and recommending a feature - that I didnt know about!
3.
▲
by
kirurik
9mo ago
Saving this
4.
▲
by
kirurik
11mo ago
I agree, I think there is such a thing as AI overuse, but I would rather someone uses AI to form their points more succinctly than for them to write something that I can't understand.
5.
▲
by
kirurik
11mo ago
To be fair, you are assuming that the input wasn't garbage to begin with. Maybe you only notice it because it is obvious. Just like someone would only notice machine translation if it is obvious.
6.
▲
Show HN: Osync – A Git and rsync tool for local syncing and backups
(github.com)
3 points
by
kirurik
11mo ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
kirurik
11mo ago
True, it is meaningless how good one is at vimgolf if it doesn't flow naturally
8.
▲
by
kirurik
11mo ago
I did the neovim tutorial which I accessed via :Tutor, I see now that vimtutor has some divergences, I will do that tutorial also, to improve my muscle memory and knowledge. Thanks for your other tips as well. I'll try and approach it
9.
▲
Search and Replace in Vim
(vimregex.com)
1 points
by
kirurik
11mo ago
|
5 comments
10.
▲
by
kirurik
11mo ago
I'm currently learning vim and usign neovim, coming from VScode, wondering how y'all learned it if you made a similar switch, how long it took to learn and your opinions on purely text based editors vs smth like VScode that has a
11.
▲
by
kirurik
1y ago
It seems obvious, but I hadn't thought about it like that yet, I just assumed that the LLM was finetuned to be overly optimistic about any user input. Very elucidating.
12.
▲
by
kirurik
1y ago
True, and many not so intelligent people may overestimate their intelligence and do it. So maybe it does somehow end up being representative.
13.
▲
by
kirurik
1y ago
The self-selection bias is definitely something to consider. I’d guess people who feel relatively confident in their intelligence are more likely to take the test.
14.
▲
by
kirurik
1y ago
There definitely is an element of shooting oneself in ones own foot, but sometimes it seems unavoidable to me, or the effort just isn't worth it e.g. if I am using sklearn or numpy and the return types are ambiguous, then I'd have
15.
▲
by
kirurik
1y ago
I am not an experienced programmer, but I liked python because of the dynamic typing, but tbh no type hints are a nightmare (as I used to use python). These days I gravitate towards using type hints unless I am using an ipynb because it loo