kiers77

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by kiers77 3y ago

   Stanford's finest! LOL.
2. 2.▲
   by kiers77 3y ago

   Absolute Criminality! Behind the silk suits, the plush offices, the ivy league degrees, Finance is baldfaced thuggery.
3. 3.▲
   by kiers77 11y ago

   THE REAL QUESTION OF DESIGN: How much WATTAGE/POWER would a 56kg package of Guru Rinpoche (made of plutonium) be able to generate? any scientists care to comment?
4. 4.▲
   by kiers77 12y ago

   To imply that this MH370 was pre planned using knowledge of the fact that an Immarsat sattelite low on fuel would "wobble" and thus lead to misleading doppler data etc. is SO far fetched as to be out of hand ridiculous. YET, MH370
5. 5.▲
   by kiers77 12y ago

   don't worry: METs help increase the score for O2 intake. see my below post.
6. 6.▲
   by kiers77 12y ago

   damn straight. take this "paper" with a pinch of salt!
7. 7.▲
   by kiers77 12y ago

   FIT Treadmill Score = MPHR + 12(METs) - 4(age) + (43 pts bonus for being female). Note if you are 50 years old male, your age docks you 200 points off the top! so you start at -200, then assume you "DO" reach your maximal heartrat
8. 8.▲
   by kiers77 12y ago

   you mention: "Further the metabolic equivalent is what really does the correction" The formula given above MPHR + 12 x METS -4 x age +(female factor) is correct. however it doesn't seem to NORMALIZE for METs as you indicate.