keymone

14 ms·

1.
by keymone 5y ago
> most of the world is not at war with Russia the sooner you realize that putin is at war with you - the better.
2.
by keymone 5y ago
this virtue signaling doesn't apply to times of war. call me despicable all you want, but allowing enemy in your infospace unchecked is plain dumb.
3.
by keymone 5y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucified_boy i will argue for censoring that shit during war. i understand your position, but i disagree.
4.
by keymone 5y ago
> I'm no authority to classify or confirm whether RT is a "government propaganda vehicle". russian war shill, go fuck yourself.
5.
by keymone 5y ago
there is no "enormous nazi problem in ukraine", that is literally russian propaganda. there is much larger nazi problem in russia in fact, from existence of radical far-right groups all the way up to concentration camps for gays i
6.
by keymone 5y ago
What a dumb argument. North Korea also has hospitals. Are hospitals a sign of tyrannical dictatorship? Use your brain a little, for fucks sake.
7.
by keymone 5y ago
If CNN participated in a blatant propaganda - i would want to hold them accountable. I don't believe they did during Iraq war, primarily because CNN is not government owned media and they don't know what is true or not. You can bl
8.
by keymone 5y ago
[flagged]
9.
by keymone 5y ago
it's war. just like north korea would launch missiles during war, they would block enemy propaganda during war. doing the same doesn't make you tyrannical dictatorship - it's just means of waging war. weird that i have to exp
10.
by keymone 5y ago
do you deny that RT is russian government propaganda vehicle?
11.
by keymone 5y ago
"think RT is bad? well what about CNN?" how is that not whataboutism exactly?
12.
by keymone 5y ago
it would explain a lot about you if you don't consider north korea a tyrannical dictatorship. so do you or do you not?
13.
by keymone 5y ago
> doesn't make your take any more credible it makes my awareness of the situation on the ground stronger > 1) support censorship of enemy's propaganda vehicle. wonder why would you omit that little fact. getting paid to do s
14.
by keymone 5y ago
i am ukrainian and i am in contact with multiple people affected on the ground.
15.
by keymone 5y ago
the issue now is not "how good of a reporting does this or that media produce?" the issue is "a literal fascist government is invading a sovereign country and their propaganda machine is in full throttle mode".
16.
by keymone 5y ago
sure, from their perspective they are. but they are a tyrannical dictatorship - we know that. don't we? do you? just checking, because, you know...
17.
by keymone 5y ago
Zelensky was talking about an attack that happened within hours of his message, can't blame him for fog of war. And he didn't call for violence but for response from international community, which frankly he has every right to do
18.
by keymone 5y ago
Sure, and many do that, but you don't have to if you refer by digest of image's contents.
19.
by keymone 5y ago
There is no sociology in a dictatorship where everybody knows about repercussions of expressing an opinion that goes against their glorious leader's will.
20.
by keymone 5y ago
It's censorship of enemy's propaganda vehicle. Since when is that considered "bad"?
21.
by keymone 5y ago
Since when blocking enemy's propaganda considered "bad"?
22.
by keymone 5y ago
Are you for real comparing integrity of CNN and RT? Show me a single outright lie CNN published, comparable to RT publishing a story that ukrainian army crucified a child on a main square in 2014 which caused some people in russia to volunt
23.
by keymone 5y ago
RT reported about ukrainian army crucifying a child in Donbas in 2014 which literally caused some people in Russia to volunteer as fighters and cross the border with intention to kill ukrainians. No, RT should be banned and every person wor
24.
by keymone 5y ago
version numbers are never immutable. they are arbitrary labels that are created by some centralized authority and can be changed by that same authority. artifacts being removed is much less of a problem as artifacts being spoofed with malic
25.
by keymone 5y ago
he's a reputable investigative journalist with a track record.
26.
by keymone 5y ago
i suggest you to read my comment again, because so far what you've said applies to you more than to me.
27.
by keymone 5y ago
yeah, well, i stopped reading when i saw that "GOOD" example. it's not. and that isn't a "side point", that's the most critical point for preserving security and reproducibility of builds.
28.
by keymone 5y ago
# GOOD: image: "nginx:1.21.6" nothing "good" about it, literally no different from ":latest". only full hash reference.
29.
by keymone 5y ago
christo grozev says it's probably not fake, according to his two fsb contacts (though they disagree with some of the author's conclusions): https://twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1500197460626624513 ed
30.
by keymone 5y ago
christo grozev says it's probably not according to his two fsb contacts (though they disagree with some of the author's conclusions): https://twitter.com/christogrozev/status/1500197460626624513

More ›