keonix

7 ms·

1.
by keonix 3y ago
It would not be illegal based on fair use (though you have to be careful there also), but if you try to regurgiate large portions of the book then it would be. And we do know that models regurgiate training material verbatim (Copilot)
2.
by keonix 3y ago
If I regurgiate something I read in copyrighted book without proper license that also would be theft, no distinction there. I'm not distributing my brain, at least same (but probably more restrictive) should apply to models - training
3.
by keonix 3y ago
> with or without finetuning? With, but it's still bonkers that it works so well >Also is there a practical motivation for creating them? You could get in-between model sizes (like 20b instead of 13b or 34b). Before better quanti
4.
by keonix 3y ago
Wait until you hear about frankenmodels. You rip parts of one model (often attention heads) and transplant them in another and somehow that produces coherent results! Witchcraft https://huggingface.co/chargoddard
5.
by keonix 3y ago
I assume it's because such large context takes lots of memory, so you might as well have smarter model if you are not gonna fit in small vram anyway
6.
by keonix 3y ago
Mistral 7B ~ 8 GiB StableLM 3B ~4 GiB You could go even lower with smaller quantization if necessary. I personally wouldn't use anything smaller than 7B and Mistral already pushing it in coherence. Overall it depends on your use case,
7.
by keonix 3y ago
For what it's worth, I think OP has a point in showing inconsistencies in your logic
8.
by keonix 3y ago
That's disingenuous. You provided link to a legal framework, but not any use of it. Your source doesn't even mention a single delivery under this act. > Can you provide a source for your statement that these were donations? You
9.
by keonix 3y ago
> US isn't donating weapons to Ukraine, it's leasing them Could you kindly support your statement with the source? AFAIK most aid provided to Ukraine is not under lend-lease but donated to them
10.
by keonix 4y ago
IIRC temperature is proportional to velocity squared so increase in simulation speed will result in squared increase in temperature. But even if we account for that we are not dealing with ideal gas in real world, there bound to be collisio
11.
by keonix 4y ago
> So it’s completely subjective to you No? My prediction holds even if I didn't exist. > not anywhere near the testable physics that I was looking for. And now you are moving the goalpost.
12.
by keonix 4y ago
Sure! It's just a classification of events that each person has. Testible prediction? Socially close people will have similar classifications as opposed to randomly chosen ones (I will leave defining metric space over possible class
13.
by keonix 4y ago
GPL restricts only developers. As an end user restrictions don't even apply to you
14.
by keonix 4y ago
Nothing changes, it is still a violation
15.
by keonix 4y ago
> western Europe or the US. Why would we care about anyone not in the richest countries. It's not like they need security by default to not become another botnet and DDoS Europe or US businesses. I would like to see you justify payi
16.
by keonix 5y ago
Make it so decoding feasible only using some consumer hardware not usually found in servers, but omnipresent on consumer devices. GPU for example
17.
by keonix 5y ago
If you buy from reseller they have no way to correlate payment details to search queries. With subscription, however, service provider have your payment details and knows everything about your queries so it can build a profile on you.
18.
by keonix 5y ago
You could sell tokens that get used up after each search or expire after certain amount of time since first use. Browser extension could store tokens and provide them to website as needed in random order. Tokens could be resold so no tracki
19.
by keonix 5y ago
They do actually restrict issuer in most cases. Linus can't just strip Linux of other developers parts because they are tightly interconnected. He could relicense 30 year old version of Linux, but it would be useless
20.
by keonix 5y ago
Patents also preserve knowledge in publicly accessible and well documented form. Without patents the only option to recoup investment in R&D would be to make innovations a trade secrets. This will lead to frequent reinvention of the whe
21.
by keonix 5y ago
Sure it is, you brain is not software though
22.
by keonix 5y ago
I assume the code is a derivative work of training data because given different data code would be also different (neuron weights)
23.
by keonix 5y ago
To build a browser you don't need a verbatim GPL code, so it's not a derivative work in the same sense copilot is. Stackoverflow on the other hand is much trickier question...
24.
by keonix 5y ago
If the training set contains verbatim (A)GPL code does this mean that Copilot also should be distributed by Microsoft under GPL? Because without it Copilot (as it is distributed by Microsoft) couldn't be built, wouldn't it m
25.
by keonix 5y ago
Oh boy, that was a fun thread to read! Thanks for a laugh at GP expense
26.
by keonix 5y ago
AGPL license clearly gives you the ability to freely link with whatever software you want. The only requirement is to share it with your customers. Following your logic it could be said that MIT licensed software could not be freely used be
27.
by keonix 5y ago
It was 18 years ago, he changed[0] his views later, but nobody mentions that for some reason... [0] https://stallman.org/archives/2019-jul-oct.html#14_September...
28.
by keonix 5y ago
He did at least changed[0] his opinion on things he said in 2003 about "willful" sex between child and adult after talking to medical experts. Don't know why it took him so long, but it's an indication that he is willing