Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kdragon
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
kdragon
2y ago
It's not that strange. People tend to use what is popular. There are several implementations of core across various languages, not including custom forks of core.
2.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
There was a section of IBM's quantum computing challenge that had you encrypt/decrypt logical qbits by transforming their phase state to a known degree. If the state was altered in-transit, than the inverse transform will not canc
3.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
Plot twist: this entire shit-show was orchestrated by chatgpt while inside OpenAI's basement.
4.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
> Austin was just a bunch of housed and employed people quietly dying because our government is anti-humanist. Good lord. It was a once in a century weather event. Austin and Texas in general celebrates a limited government. So you shoul
5.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
> I haven't yet heard a rational explanation for just how badly ECDSA mangles the Schnorr protocol in exactly the way that means a lot of implementations end up with horrible security holes. I thought schnorr was under patent for a
6.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
nostr has an early NIP that talks about publishing timestamp commitments to the bitcoin blockchain, using the open timestamp protocol
7.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
it's not that big a deal if you use a hosted wallet. There's quite a few options out there, like stacker.news or wallet of satoshi.
8.
▲
by
kdragon
3y ago
You can use it as currency on stacker.news You can tip people on the nostr protocol. stats are on zaplife.lol you can tip musicians on wavlake there's a Minecraft server called satlantis where it is used as a currency there's a lo
9.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
TLDR: - Create two keypairs. - Use ECDH to derive a shared secret. - Use secret to tweak pubkey of the recipient. - Send money to the tweaked (and hashed) pubkey. - Recipient has to keep an eye out for this tweaked key on the blockchain.
10.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
Nostr partially addresses this in a few ways: * Media itself is not stored, only links to media. * Relays are free to limit usage, charge a fee or require proof of work. * There are many kinds of messages with different storage standards i.
11.
▲
Show HN: Secure end-to-end client sessions and API calls using crypto key pairs
(github.com)
9 points
by
kdragon
4y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
Gas fees are also a solution to the halting problem that comes with Ethereum's EVM (and its Turing completeness). So you are paying for space and computation.
13.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
Guilty >_> It feels nice when a protocol has its core devs on the same wavelength as application devs. That's the feeling I get with nostr.
14.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
I was being a bit dramatic with my choice of words but you are absolutely right :-D
15.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
So much FUD. 1) miners profit from energy surplus. They do not create new power plants. Nobody is firing up a new coal plant to mine bitcoin. That is absurd. 2) miners have incentives to find and use wasted energy. For ex, flare gas recycli
16.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
They do with the extended key as it includes the chain code.
17.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
My vote is for extended keys, something based off HD Wallets: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawi... Easy rotation and recovery of individual keys, but you do have to protect you
18.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
You can argue that it is not true P2P, since you rely on a public-facing intermediary. A lot of p2p protocols cheat with relays, it is really hard to traverse nats otherwise. Nostr can be used for peer discovery to bootstrap a direct p2p co
19.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
Yes this is the crux of any social media application. I don't know if there will ever be a perfect solution. I like that nostr abstracts this problem away from the relays. Relays only focus on storing data and handling subscriptions. T
20.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
fixed >_<
21.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
Great question! Relays aren't involved in curation or discovery, so it fall on the client. You can request very broad subscriptions from relays! For example, here is a site that subscribes to everything, showing you a gods-eye view of
22.
▲
Nostr is a stupid simple P2P protocol that works, built by builders
248 points
by
kdragon
4y ago
|
128 comments
23.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
As a Bitcoin maxi this is fun to watch. It's like the 08' financial collapse all over again, but there's no bailout coming this time around. I think it is glaringly obvious at this point that most of society does not understa
24.
▲
by
kdragon
4y ago
The future of micropayments will be the Lightning network. It's still under heavy development, but people use it to stream instant sub-cent payments all the time. Check out stacker.news as a live example.
25.
▲
by
kdragon
5y ago
You can't rewrite the history of blocks that have already been distributed. You may fool SPV nodes but any node with a copy of the blockchain (even if pruned) will reject your version.
26.
▲
by
kdragon
5y ago
I don't think it's fair to base a topic on the loudest voices in the room. That is a road to madness. I still wish to see more interest in technical discussion of Bitcoin here. Like the new BIP proposal expanding the scripting cap
27.
▲
by
kdragon
5y ago
I think group e2ee is overblown and self-defeating in principle. Good luck auditing a ratcheting e2ee algo. Plus it breaks often, and group encryption is defeated by any user in the chat. Direct e2ee is far simpler and can be expanded to sm
28.
▲
by
kdragon
5y ago
I feel like the HN community, who are more tech literate, should have a better understanding of Bitcoin and crypto. I don't like all the ignorant comments that focus purely on the financials. Is cryptocurrency space not full of technol
29.
▲
by
kdragon
10y ago
So I'm in the business of wheeling and dealing in these things. It's common knowledge in the industry that all of these devices likely have government backdoors or (likely deliberate) critical security flaws at any moment. Virtual
30.
▲
by
kdragon
12y ago
> 'manageable with technology we do not have' -> magic. Christ, are you for real? Was landing on the moon 'magic' up until the moment we did it? Why are people like you even on this website?
More ›