karmasimida

6 ms·

1.
by karmasimida 6d ago
I think in the end, we should just be writing some prototyping language, then let AI translate into target/native development language of the said platform. Code and optimization is going to be a niche moving forward
2.
by karmasimida 6d ago
But isn’t Tristan’s breakthrough happens in August? OpenAI can’t really train with text that doesn’t exist
3.
by karmasimida 8d ago
This is the take I agree. It is mean spirited but nevertheless sold their model
4.
by karmasimida 8d ago
I don’t know much about NS problem or Euler problem anyway. Can’t tell how significant it is to go from Tristan approach to OpenAI’s results. It is 10k agents after all with a model that is 2x-3x more powerful than Astra. So claims some int
5.
by karmasimida 8d ago
Use Bedrock or any kind of big tech hosted version of the frontier labs can be a solution. I think if secrecy is of utmost importance to you, then do not send data to first parties
6.
by karmasimida 8d ago
Because it is not finished. Their follow up claim is that OpenAI’s approach looks like another proof they had been working on the side, but hasn’t published yet
7.
by karmasimida 8d ago
Their base model must have been trained with hundreds of trillions of tokens several months ahead, at this point of time, it is impossible to rule out the possibility the model had seen that session at one point of time, and it probably did
8.
by karmasimida 13d ago
Yes, please have it checked
9.
by karmasimida 13d ago
Idk, this means the benchmark has bigger problems ... no way Astra will be worse than Opus 5 Only thing I would trust is the what X/Twitter crowds are saying about a model after 2-3 weeks of its launch. But before that I would already
10.
by karmasimida 1mo ago
No BS, it is the MOST shocking tech story I have ever read. The amount craziness packed in 30 minutes is beyond my wildest imagination. Why no traction?
11.
by karmasimida 1mo ago
A model can't be updated, and a chip that is only relevant for 6 months at max?
12.
by karmasimida 1mo ago
Literally, I am ... I don't know what to say
13.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
Better than human at least the one you can pay 200 dollars/hour to get advice from, IMO
14.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
Yes this is why models are superior here: they can equally (opportunity wise) attend everything in their context window.
15.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
Let's be honest with ourselves, AI review is better than human right now, especially top tier models. Not saying that for important project like Chrome, you can skip reviewing changes. Far from it. But it is probably better and more th
16.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
I believe this is true. The implication would be more interesting though. 1. Some voice will start calling for banning DEPLOYMENT of open source models in US. Simply hosting them will become regulated, or at least USG will attempt to do so.
17.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
Because the model capability is beyond their expectation. This is brilliant marketing but I think it is real.
18.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
ChatGPT has replaced 90% of Google for me ... that is another 1T source of income for OpenAI
19.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
Is it? 2.8T isn't open in the open source sense
20.
GPT 5.6 Sol Post-Trained Luna Autonomously(twitter.com)
1 points by karmasimida 2mo ago|1 comments
21.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
https://x.com/larrylv/status/2075279982847541278
22.
by karmasimida 2mo ago
It is possible because they hired the original author of Bun to do this. It won't be possible to HIRE anyone doing this job confidently, they won't even know if they f*ked up. I am not too worried anyway, one person with no contex
23.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
He is close or already a billionaire, not sure much more money will be do much heavy-lifting
24.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
Dario's brain child
25.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
I think some of the commenters are naive to think government intervention is silly and TACO. No, Dario said himself AI is national state weapon, then the government will not cease control. What would happen is that we will have a more lobot
26.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
https://wap.eastmoney.com/a/202605203743576829.html
27.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/china-restricts-o...
28.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
It is also prevent the employees leaving because the lure of US capital
29.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
China had already forbade their top researchers to even leave China. Also foreign investments into Chinese AI labs have already been forbidden and asked to exit
30.
by karmasimida 3mo ago
Anthropic hates open weight Chinese models so yes

More ›