Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kannonboy
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
kannonboy
2y ago
From the homepage it sounds like they've prioritised geometry fidelity for CV research rather than performance: > Infinigen is optimized for computer vision research, particularly 3D vision. Infinigen does not use bump/normal-m
2.
▲
by
kannonboy
2y ago
The same authors also created Infinigen Indoors[1] to generate indoor scenes for computer vision applications such as robotics & AR. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11824
3.
▲
by
kannonboy
2y ago
I love that the view count is included in the minimalist UI. I came across one with zero views, and there's something so intimate and exciting about being the first person to watch an ancient home video (even if it's shaky handyca
4.
▲
by
kannonboy
6y ago
Hey folks, Atlassian employee here! This isn't official comms but I wanted to identify myself in case there's any confusion :) As is pointed out elsewhere on this thread, we're tracking the request to disable the feature here
5.
▲
Git credential helper vulnerability announced
(github.blog)
2 points
by
kannonboy
6y ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
Atlassian launches new FaaS platform for apps
(zdnet.com)
5 points
by
kannonboy
7y ago
|
0 comments
7.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Possibly not quite what you were after, but JIRA integrates almost as well with GitHub/GitHub:Enterprise as it does with Bitbucket/Bitbucket Server. With GitHub + JIRA you get: - associated branches, commits, and pull requests d
8.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Thanks! Just Keynote & GIMP on macOS
9.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Thanks Peff, congrats on the great release! I came up with 19,290 using the generalized birthday formula[0] (actually after double-checking it's slightly closer to 19,291). 16,384 is the value you get using the square approximation met
10.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Great write-up! I love the focus on performance in this release. I've put together another write-up of the Git 2.11 release that discusses some of the other new features (and goes into a little more detail on some of the 'sundries
11.
▲
What's new in Git 2.11?
(medium.com)
25 points
by
kannonboy
10y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
Setting Breakpoints on a Snowy Evening
(medium.com)
2 points
by
kannonboy
10y ago
|
0 comments
13.
▲
Scaling in Bitbucket Cloud: new features and reliability numbers
(blog.bitbucket.org)
91 points
by
kannonboy
10y ago
|
41 comments
14.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Absolutely. An alternative title for the comic would be "For the love of branch permissions". The second developer in the comic is doing the right thing by creating a feature branch. However even in a strict branching workflow, th
15.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Comic author here. For the command-line I use a post-checkout hook to display the build status of a commit whenever I switch commits: https://bitbucket.org/tpettersen/bitbucket-build-status-hook That way if I update ma
16.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Aerobatic ( https://www.aerobatic.com/ ) takes a similar, though slightly more flexible, approach with their static site deployments for Bitbucket. You pick a branch then (optionally) specify a sub-directory of your repositor
17.
▲
Six great features we didn't ship
(blog.bitbucket.org)
10 points
by
kannonboy
10y ago
|
0 comments
18.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
In fact, we just launched Hg support for Bitbucket's built-in CI/CD, Bitbucket Pipelines: https://blog.bitbucket.org/2016/07/26/bitbucket-pipelines-be...
19.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Hi timv, Bitbucket engineer here. I'm not on the PM team, but to my knowledge we have no plans to discontinue Hg support. The Bitbucket repo population is roughly 90% Git and 10% Mercurial, but due to our scale that is still a freakin
20.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
I'm an Atlassian engineer & heavy Aerobatic user. It's very nicely integrated with Bitbucket, and has great support for Jekyll, Hugo, and arbitrary npm builds. It also has some advantages over github.io like being able to depl
21.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
One of the nice things about Git is that it's an extremely portable data format, so vendor lock-in between Bitbucket, GitLab & GitHub isn't too big a deal. There may be a little project metadata that needs to be migrated using
22.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Bitbucket engineer here. Not to derail, but since Bitbucket has been brought up a few times in this thread and we're talking differentiating features this seems relevant: Bitbucket also has native Docker-based CI/CD in the form of
23.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Bitbucket engineer here! In Bitbucket Cloud - i.e. bitbucket.org - we cap the diff size for pull requests at 10000 lines. In Bitbucket Server we also cap the number of lines in a particular diff at 10000 by default, but you can override thi
24.
▲
Git 2.9 is out
(blog.bitbucket.org)
7 points
by
kannonboy
10y ago
|
0 comments
25.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Nice one! I'm a developer from Atlassian, it's cool to see the different CI/CD applications that Pipelines is being used for. Regarding static site deployment specifically, Aerobatic ( https://www.aerobatic.com/
26.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
I suspect this repository has the issue tracker mode set to "private". If the owner changes it to "public" issues will be anonymously accessible: http://i.imgur.com/JqCvXNU.png
27.
▲
by
kannonboy
10y ago
Actually Bitbucket Server (née Stash) already supports squashing and a variety of other pull request merge strategies. They're just configured[0] per repository, project or globally rather than an explicit option at merge time. [0]:
28.
▲
by
kannonboy
11y ago
Thanks for your thoughts debacle! Let me address them slightly out of order: > Each individual Atlassian tool has enough minor style differences to make the ecosystem feel less cohesive. I think the minor style differences are in part an
29.
▲
by
kannonboy
11y ago
They stand for "Type" and "Priority". I believe they're abbreviated to give you maximum space for the issue title, if you hover over the column header you'll see the full column name - but I agree that's n
30.
▲
by
kannonboy
11y ago
Hi adnanh, Bitbucket dev here. I agree we have a different UI to GitHub, but horrific seems a little strong. Our designers & front-enders spend a lot of time pixel pushing to build out a UX focused on professional teams. We even have a
More ›