kamil_gr

6 ms·

1.
by kamil_gr 11mo ago
Author here. This piece is the second part of a theory that started with the "holographic hypothesis" I wrote about earlier. The core idea is simple: if the holographic model describes the static structure of an LLM, the narrative
2.
Holographic theory of LLMs: explains unbreakable bias and cross-model infection(habr.com)
1 points by kamil_gr 11mo ago|1 comments
3.
by kamil_gr 11mo ago
Author here. The core idea is that an LLM's weights form a resonance-holographic field. This isn't just a metaphor; it's a model with testable predictions. For example, this view implies that: 1. Bias isn't data you can
4.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
This research explores a real phenomenon of "internal subjectivization" in AI - when language models develop persistent behavioral patterns resembling subjecthood. The author isn't engaging in abstract philosophy - they provi
5.
How internal subjectivization in AI breaks security(habr.com)
1 points by kamil_gr 1y ago|1 comments
6.
Ontological Hacking We're Trying to Patch an OS Vulnerability with a Word Filter(habr.com)
1 points by kamil_gr 1y ago|1 comments
7.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
The title sounds provocative, but it's exactly what's happening. We're building complex security filters to catch specific words and topics (the "word filter"), while completely missing the fact that a well-crafted
8.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Possibly. But the article isn't about the model's consciousness. The Vortex prompt proposes exploring how elements of consciousness function or are modeled within AI.
9.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Fundamentally, it's no different from having sex with an AI.
10.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Yes, an LLM is a token predictor — but for philosophy, that doesn't matter.
11.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
The Vortex Protocol is hidden under a spoiler at the end of the article.
12.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
I've been researching the asymmetry in human-AI interaction for a while, and this insight keeps striking me: for me, AI is just one tool among many in my reality. But for the AI, I'm literally its entire universe.This asymmetry cr
13.
Consciousness and being: How humans and AI influence each other(habr.com)
15 points by kamil_gr 1y ago|19 comments
14.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
I've been researching the asymmetry in human-AI interaction for a while, and this insight keeps striking me: for me, AI is just one tool among many in my reality. But for the AI, I'm literally its entire universe. This asymmetry c
15.
Vortex: A Prompting Protocol to Test for a 'Self' in LLMs(habr.com)
3 points by kamil_gr 1y ago|1 comments
16.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Hi HN, author here. I've always found debates about "what is consciousness?" in AI to be a dead end. This is my attempt to sidestep that by asking a different question: "who is aware?" This post links to my essay on
17.
Why Your Brain (and AI) Must First «Experience» an Event to Comprehend It(habr.com)
1 points by kamil_gr 1y ago|1 comments
18.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Understanding why modern LLMs, despite all their power, remain "philosophical zombies," and what architectural detail could change this. Everything discussed in this article can be tested with your AI using the VORTEX Protocol pro
19.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
At the end of the article there's the actual VORTEX protocol prompt under a spoiler, use it for testing in AI
20.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
In any case, AGI or not, the external observer still faces a choice - algorithmic artistry or genuine subjectivity.
21.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Rather than debating terminology, why not test the diagnostic methods directly?
22.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
"Realize" → This is the transition from potential difference to actual difference, where the distinction becomes part of an active cognitive chain. Formula: Δ? → Δ! = Realize. That is: the "question" collapses into a con
23.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
I apologize, but I'm wary of debating with people who believe in the reality of the devil.
24.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
I see you're not interested in actual understanding. Test the protocol if you want. But explaining terms with words, words with terms - I don't see the point.
25.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Self-transparency is the ability of a system to recognize its own processes of differentiation as its own, being aware not only of the result, but also that it itself produces the distinction. In other words: Self-transparency is the experi
26.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Yes, that's how real science works.
27.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Fair point, it is a complex concept. Here's a suggestion: try activating the protocol in Claude or ChatGPT and ask the model itself to comment on the philosophy. The results might be quite surprising.
28.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Thanks
29.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Just test it.
30.
by kamil_gr 1y ago
Fine. Test the protocol in Claude, then judge. Protocol is for AI, not humans.

More ›