kadenshep

9 ms·

1.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I don't see anything that doesn't meet those requirements.
2.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>but otherwise I don't see a good use for it for properly designed and new projects. What's your definition of properly designed projects?
3.
by kadenshep 8y ago
It definitely affects labor productivity.
4.
by kadenshep 8y ago
That study doesn't even remotely support what you said. If that's all you can find you're basically just making stuff up.
5.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I hope so, perfectly happy to have it go over my head.
6.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>reliably causes "liberal" and atheistic feelings I'm sorry, where are you getting this from? That seems contradictory to common knowledge in this subject, and if you want to do a silly thing like label certain behaviors &
7.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Seems like a really fragile attitude to take when you're the head of a company.
8.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>there are plenty of ACH/SWIFT transfers that are actually just people moving money from account to account or institution to institution too, rather than actual inter-party transactions. You're transferring banking systems&#x2
9.
Falsehoods almost always beat out the truth on Twitter(theatlantic.com)
4 points by kadenshep 8y ago|0 comments
10.
Parking Has Eaten American Cities(citylab.com)
1 points by kadenshep 8y ago|0 comments
11.
by kadenshep 8y ago
...for orbital launches, which is quite literally what 99% of these rockets have been used for. Which also is exactly what we are talking about. It's only confusing if you're wanting to be disingenuous.
12.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Yes, it wasn't built by ULA. >The Atlas V was developed by Lockheed Martin Commercial Launch Services Honestly just stop.
13.
by kadenshep 8y ago
You could maybe, I dunno, click on the wikipedia link and read it.
14.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>the Delta and Long March families are very large and very old and if you count the earliest attempts of governments to build ICBMs you get reliability figures worse than SpaceX. "If you do this thing that you didn't do, you ge
15.
by kadenshep 8y ago
You can click on each rocket and look at the launch history. I am again, done with this conversation because of how disingenuous you are willing to be.
16.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>Counting 'family' legacy back to ICBMs is ludicrous. I didn't do that and you know it. Those are all rockets used in orbital payload missions. All of them have been used within the last 5 years. I used some inline JS for
17.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>SpaceX's failure rate is in line with industry norms. SpaceX's 93% launch success rate is still below average for ALL launches (94-95%), and has a higher incident rate than its "competitors" in any form. That's
18.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Okay how does that negate the other payload losses that SpaceX has had, with only half the number of launches as its competitor? SpaceX has 61 launches according to this: http://www.spacex.com/missions You've totally m
19.
by kadenshep 8y ago
https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2018/01/15/doubts... I googled it for you. >"Zuma" satellite is the third payload sitting on a Falcon 9 that has been lost in four years. By w
20.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I edited my comment to remove the statement "Stop blaming people for a system they didn't choose." I'm sorry you read it. It was unnecessary and you're right, you're not really victim blaming. I got frustrated
21.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>You would have to show that people are not investing because they have no extra money and not that they are choosing to use their money now instead of investing. We know they don't have enough money to invest. Average income + aver
22.
by kadenshep 8y ago
There's an HN thread that links to the source article: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17549797
23.
by kadenshep 8y ago
This is one of the subjects I wish developers (of all persuasions) would consistently put pressure on local representatives; don't let these sales to voting companies just happen without pushback. We can't expect representatives o
24.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Wouldn't the correct thing to do in that case then would be to wholesale delete pro/anti musk threads that specifically revolve around him as a CEO? Right now it seems like current moderation tactics are encouraging a "lie ha
25.
by kadenshep 8y ago
> People who weren't online in an earlier time should probably refrain from making statements about how it was different > But some of their and your facile generalizations about the past are still rather amusing. Would you care
26.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I think your view point is directly addressed in the article. Are you saying I was not around during the time periods discussed? Also you have a rather lengthy response but most of it is just vague dismissals based on aggressive assumptions
27.
by kadenshep 8y ago
There is a narrative that things like gun control, abortion, etc are subjective subjects. They're really not. Being disingenuous (which is really pervasive in American politics) or taking nonconstructive stances to support a narrative
28.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I think a lot of people who actively moderate truly public forums/media channels understand this. Not doing anything is the worst thing you can do. At this point in my online life, claiming that "if you ignore them they'll go
29.
by kadenshep 8y ago
It's not really subjective, unless you're going to go down the rabbit hole of "everything" being subjective making any discussion around this matter pointless. >when they don't agree with your groups solutions on
30.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Or, it's neither of those things. Scott Adams is just being contrarian, as per usual.

More ›