kadendogthing

7 ms·

1.
by kadendogthing 5y ago
He gave a few examples, but to be honest HN filters for quantity over quality with topic discussion. It cargo cults academia but isn't actually very academic or novel. Spread out your thoughts in a PG style manner and make sure it&#x27
2.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>Here's why YouTube can go fuck itself I stopped reading. YouTube is a completely free platform. It will even pay you to host your content there if it's popular enough. You're free to go else where. TiKTok does not pay you
3.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
Anyone who's had to analyze complex systems at a high level will recognize that this is a pattern that often emerges in some form. The over all pattern happens in game engines, plugin systems, UI frameworks, in service buses, all over
4.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>We’ve been undergoing a 70-year long period of deregulation, and it’s been overwhelmingly positive. This is such a ridiculously untrue statement.
5.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>Here's one situation where it is very different. It's not.
6.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
> I kind of wonder what parallel universe you come from. The one where I don't value bespoke development just because it's bespoke? The universe where I have to actually quantify what's good and what isn't? The worst
7.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
Yes. I don't know why HN likes to pretend they're exceptions to patterns and processes that came about for a number of reasons. In this specific case, the hand crafted HTML that I've come across in my lifetime is usually abso
8.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
This reads like script kiddies who became professional programmers and just want things done how they've always been done. Error handling in go is not concise, and calling it explicit is in insult to anyone with a modicum of abstract r
9.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>the compensation should reflect the confluence of supply and demand in the market. Yeah. There's no way way it's more complicated than this. If there are other effects not reflected on a simple X/Y axis then I don't
10.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
Here's an exercise for the reader: * Why is this coming from "tulsatoday" * Why is the article written in a particular manner? * What biases and agenda is the publication attempting to platform here?
11.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
Here is a rule: >Please don't submit comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills. Allow me to point out a few characteristics of this post: * A submission to reddit * No actual
12.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
We don't have direct democracy. We don't usually rely on any form of democracy for a large set of actions we take as a society. So I truly don't understand your confusion.
13.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
No. Not sure why you think you can so bluntly pretend I said things I didn't say. But again this is HN attempting to discuss civics so I shouldn't be surprised.
14.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>if we assume that most people people are too gullible and dumb to live in a society Most people don't have the experience to properly discern information that they aren't intimately familiar with. They don't practice it.
15.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>NYtimes seems hellbent on convincing people that any information that is not vetted by other humans of authority (preferably themselves) is a danger to society that must be banned. I mean it objectively is. https://www.rand.o
16.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
Have you considered the possibility that these are predicted but we don't elect people who will effectively listen to qualified individuals on these matters? And that the system currently in place rewards those who use these crisis to
17.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>Netflix shows that there's an appetite towards paying for content Content that was originally created with advertising money (The Office). Whether or not Netflix will last the next 5 years is debatable and unknown.
18.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
I think I can't read.
19.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>Accidents like this don’t happen in the West/civilized world Surely you must be joking? Am I not reading this correctly?
20.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
> although the U.S.'s position is concerning It's certainly not surprising. >especially as a bastion of religious freedom I would not use the word bastion here. Maybe technically it has religious freedom in code, but in prac
21.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>Publish the actual paper or this is just vaporware nonsense. Even without the data it's not non-sense. It's a pretty rational hypothesis. Being rational definitely doesn't make something right, but it's about as far
22.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
I largely agree with the OP. I think these technologies can only be viewed in an optimistic way through a techno-libertarian lens; a perspective I don't think has any practical grounding in reality at best and at worst actively ignores
23.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>That is the beauty of free speech. There is absolutely nothing beautiful about it and there is negative utility in allowing it to proliferate. It actively causes resource usage and damage that is unnecessary and totally avoidable.
24.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
No there isn't.
25.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>The feelings of “you’re a white male and you work in tech and you are wealthy you are a SATAN” is just becoming too much :(. Yeah this literally doesn't happen.
26.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
>I'm thinking specifically about the decline in church attendance. This is an often repeated point but I don't see how it has any credence. Most people who attend churches may talk with each other for just a few hours -- and pe
27.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
On the other hand, it's NYC. There's standing water everywhere.
28.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
How is that racist?
29.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
This is one of those industries where we're just externalizing costs. Cruises as a whole definitely need to be more expensive to reflect the environment costs associated with not just the boats, but the wanton consumption that happens
30.
by kadendogthing 7y ago
How in the absolute fuck is this the top comment? There's so many platitudes stuffed side by side it just needs to be flagged. That is to say: citation needed. For all of it.

More ›