k3d3

7 ms·

1.
by k3d3 10y ago
I think they'd have to use a different base board - the C2 uses an Amlogic S905, which as far as I know doesn't support USB3.
2.
by k3d3 11y ago
> For example, using it sleep tracking, or for waking you via vibration (as not to disturb your partner) Yes, the pebble is great for that. > or even just allowing your phone to detect that you're asleep so it can turn on do-not-
3.
by k3d3 11y ago
It's not an increase in obscurity though: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/TextFormat... The format is intentionally being built in a way that you can look at the source, in the sam
4.
by k3d3 11y ago
SQRL relies on phone cameras and QR codes, for one
5.
by k3d3 11y ago
Why would you make all of your commit messages "1", instead of explaining what the added code does in each?
6.
by k3d3 11y ago
You can already use TLS client certificates - the UI is just terrible is all.
7.
by k3d3 11y ago
The problem with hashes of hashes is now instead of the password being directly grabbed, the hash is directly grabbed, which can be thrown through the challenge-response system with no problem. This only mitigates knowing the password itsel
8.
by k3d3 11y ago
You might find interest in https://hacks.mozilla.org/2015/09/subresource-integrity-in-f...
9.
by k3d3 11y ago
It mitigates passive MITM attacks, for one. On the other hand, there's nothing that's made _worse_ by choosing to do it that way. Plenty of things that are the same, some things better, but nothing worse.
10.
by k3d3 11y ago
Mozilla Persona / BrowserID might be of interest to you.
11.
by k3d3 11y ago
Which is then going beyond just using scrypt on the client. What you explain is simply challenge-response authentication.
12.
by k3d3 11y ago
If you use netstrings, why not take it a step further and just use bencoding?
13.
by k3d3 11y ago
IM has ruined me, so I think of it as "yur" (as in ur being a shortened "your")
14.
by k3d3 11y ago
Sorry to say, but if the source is not available for a crypto tool, it's probably not worth looking at. Best of luck though.
15.
by k3d3 11y ago
Actually he was asking about both
16.
by k3d3 11y ago
And then after that they'll rename it to Firefox
17.
by k3d3 11y ago
> Essentially, the site uses JavaScript for showing images without providing any advantage to either the user or the site. That is a very baseless and false conclusion.
18.
by k3d3 11y ago
To be fair, I'd hardly say that not knowing what a monad is = not knowing anything about FP.
19.
by k3d3 11y ago
Yep, exactly. Also it's nice to have the extra privacy, especially when linking to images privately amongst friends
20.
by k3d3 11y ago
Nobody else has been able to reproduce it, and you haven't given enough information on what you're doing or what you've tried. Have you tried different machines? Different browsers? Have you tried pressing the various buttons
21.
by k3d3 11y ago
> impossible to view the image in a new tab seperately But it's entirely possible, and there's even a dedicated button to view just the image. ("View in Browser"). Make sure your browser is functioning properly - this
22.
by k3d3 11y ago
Works fine for me. Make sure your browser is functioning properly. This website works in every browser I've used, and I've never heard of any problem even remotely close to what you say you're running into.
23.
by k3d3 11y ago
> that the site is almost unusable. The site is perfectly usable. More than usable, even, because I get RES-style zooming for free, amongst other things. You can right-click save normally already - just right-click and save. If you want
24.
by k3d3 11y ago
Works fine for me
25.
by k3d3 11y ago
That doesn't make it okay
26.
by k3d3 11y ago
The decryption is done in a web worker, not the UI thread. That shouldn't be the cause.
27.
by k3d3 11y ago
We're actually not sure what most people use (apart from ShareX) for uploading images, but we're looking to implement functionality into new clients to support Up1 for sure. That would be awesome! If you run into any trouble, be s
28.
by k3d3 11y ago
That's true. It's also open source, unlike MEGA.nz.
29.
by k3d3 11y ago
Currently the upload size max is 50MB. There were no plans to password protect images, but that's a good idea! For now, the post key itself (after the # in the URL) somewhat acts as a password.
30.
by k3d3 11y ago
Try uploading images and things to https://up1.ca/ Also be sure to check out ShareX at https://github.com/Upload/ShareX , a popular screen-shot tool adapted to work with Up1. Contributions to the code

More ›