k32k

6 ms·

1.
by k32k 6mo ago
I think those comments are signalling something much deeper about the individual.
2.
by k32k 6mo ago
Indeed, I feel this place has gone insane. There's no balance here. You've got boosters and then you've got people who are panicking/fighting against anything pro-AI.
3.
by k32k 6mo ago
This year is either going to show that LLMs are really going to be super-transformative, or, the investment thesis is a basket-case. Strap in.
4.
by k32k 6mo ago
Compared with today, on average, they did. There's a generation of people that 'typ lyk dis'. So yes.
5.
by k32k 6mo ago
Doesnt this apply with the hysteria of LLMs? The question being - are LLMs 'good' at interpreting and making choices/decisions about data structures and relationships? I do not write code for a living but I studied comp sci.
6.
by k32k 6mo ago
"But translating my prompts to code is not working as well, because my prompts are in natural languages, and hence ambiguous." Not only that, but there's something very annoying and deeply dissatisfying about typing a bunch o
7.
by k32k 6mo ago
" There's still decades worth of progress to be made this way." That's not true. Moreover the progress can slow to a crawl where it's barely noticeable. And in that world the humans continues to stay ahead - that&#x
8.
by k32k 6mo ago
I think this is where we are at, too. But if you say stuff like this on here you get down voted. Why?
9.
by k32k 6mo ago
Many people I know initially used ChatGPT for awhile. Then after awhile they went to Gemini. Again stuck with it for awhile. And now are dabbling with Claude. Yep there really is no switching cost it seems. People generally want something f
10.
by k32k 6mo ago
Of course they are. I’m not an insider so I wouldn’t know the specifics.
11.
by k32k 6mo ago
Your example is flawed. The professional typist' role evolved - to serving through other ways, as you say - by become executive assistants. Much like a Bank Tellers' role also evolved. And its not because they (executives) are too
12.
by k32k 6mo ago
Ermm.. of course they will. And deservedly so. Perhaps the AI Ceo's will learn the harsh lesson that Government is king, no matter what, and doesn't care about your on-paper-based wealth. Any party that puts this forward in their
13.
by k32k 6mo ago
" It is guaranteed to split that way." There's no guarantee whatsoever.
14.
by k32k 6mo ago
Yeah OpenClaw for me was the alarm sounding... not just because of the project itself, but the fight between Altman and Zuck to pursue him. It shows a fundamental lack of product sensibility/visionary thinking within OAI and Meta. Havi
15.
by k32k 6mo ago
I did lol. I can't speak for enterprise in totality, but I see a world where Apple is the dominant provider of products/services for consumer and SMB's. Google's lack of investment in marketing, design and sales/dis
16.
by k32k 6mo ago
My feeling is that some event will happen close-to-IPO that spooks investors, that results in OAI not IPO'ing. Remember if there are under-writers involved they will not want to go forward. Then they will face financial distress, and q
17.
by k32k 6mo ago
Oh lets see. They were ridiculed for being 'behind on AI'. They haven't spent a dime on investing in AI-related infrastructure and so on... And yet, they could stand to be the biggest beneficiaries if not the only. Given that
18.
by k32k 6mo ago
When I read this comment all I see is: LLM at the edge - or close to it - will become available. And whoever provides the best eco-system across digital lifestyle and business wins. Oh... Apple? lol. Well that'd be funny wouldn't